AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference 2015
DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-1538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic Parameter Identification and Uncertainty Quantification for Small Unmanned Aircraft

Abstract: This paper examines a method to estimate aerodynamic parameters, identify the uncertainty in the parameter estimates, and estimate the model form uncertainties from flight test data. This information is required for simulations designed to estimate the reliability of the system. Output error techniques are used in parameter estimation, and uncertainty in these estimates is based on the Cramér-Rao lower bound. The model form uncertainty is estimated based on model validation metrics. The model form uncertaintie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such approaches include prediction error methods (PEM) [6], [7], [8], maximum likelihood (ML) methods [9], [10], least square (LS) methods [11], frequency response identification methods [12], [13], [14], and neural network-based methods [15], [16], [17]. Several studies in the literature applied these techniques to UAV operation with accurate identification results [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]. Nonetheless, these methods require extensive data generation and accurate selection of optimizer initial conditions, which demand human experience and cause sus-ceptibility to data biases and overfitting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Such approaches include prediction error methods (PEM) [6], [7], [8], maximum likelihood (ML) methods [9], [10], least square (LS) methods [11], frequency response identification methods [12], [13], [14], and neural network-based methods [15], [16], [17]. Several studies in the literature applied these techniques to UAV operation with accurate identification results [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]. Nonetheless, these methods require extensive data generation and accurate selection of optimizer initial conditions, which demand human experience and cause sus-ceptibility to data biases and overfitting.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, these methods require extensive data generation and accurate selection of optimizer initial conditions, which demand human experience and cause sus-ceptibility to data biases and overfitting. Furthermore, most of these methods are computationally expensive and not suitable for real-time applications; they are instead applied offline to process an abundance of previously collected flight or operational data [18], [19], [20], [21], [22].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notice that, the observation function Ψ i (̂i,̂i) is defined as (6), in this way it follows then that .…”
Section: Smomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, this parametric variation directly affects the control laws, which could negatively impact the vehicle performance [4]. To deal with this complex scenario, researches have proposed different approaches, for example, (i) algorithms to estimate the variation of the vehicle mass [5], or (ii) algorithms for the identification of aerodynamic parameters [6], which are further used in the control loop. The Gradient Algorithm (GA) has been a frequently used parameter estimator due to its effectiveness and easiness of implementation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When evaluating the turbulence effects on fixed-wing airplanes, the Dryden spectral model, which assumes a "frozen-field", is normally used (Hale et al 2017). However, the Dryden model is not suitable for a lowspeed rotorcraft as the mean wind speed becomes dominant (Dahl and Faulkner 1978).…”
Section: Computational Fluid Dynamics (Cfd) Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%