2013
DOI: 10.1175/jhm-d-13-080.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic Resistance and Penman–Monteith Evapotranspiration over a Seasonally Two-Layered Canopy in Semiarid Central Australia

Abstract: Accurate prediction of evapotranspiration E depends upon representative characterization of meteorological conditions in the boundary layer. Drag and bulk transfer coefficient schemes for estimating aerodynamic resistance to vapor transfer were compared over a semiarid natural woodland ecosystem in central Australia. Aerodynamic resistance was overestimated from the drag coefficient, resulting in limited E at intermediate values of vapor pressure deficit. Large vertical humidity gradients were present during t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…estimate G c as a function of aerodynamic resistance to momentum transfer (r a ) following Cleverly, Chen, et al (2013):…”
Section: The Penman-monteith Equation Was Inverted (Equation 3) Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…estimate G c as a function of aerodynamic resistance to momentum transfer (r a ) following Cleverly, Chen, et al (2013):…”
Section: The Penman-monteith Equation Was Inverted (Equation 3) Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PM method has been recommended as the standard potential evapotranspiration method by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) because it is based on the physical mechanism and can be used globally in many regions without requiring the over parameterization (Tegos et al, ; J. Zhang et al, ; Zotarelli et al, ). In addition, a number of continental‐ and global‐scale evaporation models (Chen et al, ; Ferguson et al, ; Mu et al, ) and small‐scale vegetation transpiration models (Cleverly et al, ; Tukimat et al, ) have beenformed on the theoretical basis of the PM method. In most cases, the PM method also was used as the criterion to test the reliability of the calculation results obtained using other methods (Tukimat et al, ; Widmoser, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al, 2016;Zotarelli et al, 2016). In addition, a number of continental-and global-scale evaporation models Ferguson et al, 2010;Mu et al, 2011) and small-scale vegetation transpiration models (Cleverly et al, 2013;Tukimat et al, 2012) have beenformed on the theoretical basis of the PM method. In most cases, the PM method also was used as the criterion to test the reliability of the calculation results obtained using other methods (Tukimat et al, 2012;Widmoser, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy limitations are common in maritime and mesic environments, that is, where P exceeds reference evapotranspiration (which is a function of VPD, solar radiation and aerodynamic conductance; Cleverly et al 2013a;Cleverly et al 2013b;Donohue et al 2009;Moore et al 2008). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%