2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2011.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic shape optimization using efficient evolutionary algorithms and unstructured CFD solver

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Marco and Lanteri (2000) used a parallel GA to reduce computation costs in airfoil optimum design. Zhang et al (2002) optimized airfoil and wing in subsonic and transonic regime by the implementation of GA. Jahangirian and Shahrokhi (2011) employed GA to optimize airfoil aerodynamic performance using CFD techniques. They also presented a fast method for aerodynamic optimization of transonic airfoil by means of GA and neural networks (Shahrokhi and Jahangirian 2010).…”
Section: Fig 1 Euroshock Presented Methods To Reduce Shock Wave Relmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marco and Lanteri (2000) used a parallel GA to reduce computation costs in airfoil optimum design. Zhang et al (2002) optimized airfoil and wing in subsonic and transonic regime by the implementation of GA. Jahangirian and Shahrokhi (2011) employed GA to optimize airfoil aerodynamic performance using CFD techniques. They also presented a fast method for aerodynamic optimization of transonic airfoil by means of GA and neural networks (Shahrokhi and Jahangirian 2010).…”
Section: Fig 1 Euroshock Presented Methods To Reduce Shock Wave Relmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this way, it is ensured that the design obtained is optimum with respect to the simulator system (CFD solver) and not only to the surrogate model. For more information about the SVMr, EAs and IES-SL readers can consult [6,7,10,11].…”
Section: Proposed Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, a combination of a generic algorithm (GA) and an artificial neural network (ANN) was applied in [7] to the shape optimization of an airfoil, parameterized by a modified PARSEC parameterization involving ten design variables. In [8] a surrogate based on Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) was applied to the aerodynamic shape optimization of an airfoil geometry parameterized by sixteen design variables defined with Class Shape Transformation method (CST).…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the substantial cost of using a global optimization approach for an ASO problem, and the apparent lack of multimodality in a number of ASO problems, global optimizers have had only a small use in ASO, see [37][38][39][40][41] for example. However, to investigate the mutimodality of the ADODG multimodal benchmark problem, a state-of-the-art constrained global optimization framework [42] is employed here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%