2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2017.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerodynamic–structural missile fin optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The missile taken to carry out this study was a standard AGARD-B model of slender, four-fin, blunt-nose configuration whose geometry was taken from [1]. The blunt nose was chosen for the missile so as to make the configuration of the missile aerodynamically efficient by minimizing the shock waves generated at the nose-tip by transferring the kinetic energy generated, to the atmosphere, thus reducing the frictional effects and on the missile body.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The missile taken to carry out this study was a standard AGARD-B model of slender, four-fin, blunt-nose configuration whose geometry was taken from [1]. The blunt nose was chosen for the missile so as to make the configuration of the missile aerodynamically efficient by minimizing the shock waves generated at the nose-tip by transferring the kinetic energy generated, to the atmosphere, thus reducing the frictional effects and on the missile body.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The missile [1] was modelled in Spaceclaim using basic sketching tools with a length (L) of 763.7mm. The creation of the domain was done to analyze the nature of the flow specifically around the missile model and within the domain so as to obtain more accurate results.…”
Section: Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Journal homepage: https://content.sciendo.com Today's computer-aided design techniques have many successful integrations of CAD-CAE and optimization tools to implement industrial product design systems [25]- [28]. These design applications were developed to facilitate the structural optimization in the different discipline fields with basically identical concepts and, therefore, designers have benefited more from them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, topology optimization is frequently employed to determine the optimum location of certain structural components under static and aeroelastic loads [8,9]. Additionally, a lot of work has been accomplished for the solution of local structural problems, e.g., buckling issues or lay-up optimization [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], aeroelasticity, flutter [18], local optimization of panels or areas with cut-outs [19][20][21] for obtaining lighter designs. The aforementioned studies refer to a 2-spar arrangement only and to some specific structural problems, while the advantages that can be obtained by accommodating additional spar (more than two) in the wingbox as well as the design methodology that has to be followed is not exhaustively covered.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%