2012
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2012.669873
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerosol Acidity Measurement Using Colorimetry Coupled With a Reflectance UV-Visible Spectrometer

Abstract: In this study, aerosol acidity was measured using colorimetry integrated with a Reflectance UV-Visible spectrometer (C-RUV). An inorganic aerosol comprising NH 4 + −H + −SO 4 2− −H 2 O was generated using an atomizer and introduced into a 2-m 3 indoor Teflon film chamber. The produced aerosol was collected on the Tefloncoated glass fiber filter dyed with metanil yellow (MY) as an indicator for measuring proton concentrations in aerosol. A calibration curve for measuring aerosol acidity using the C-RUV techniqu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The colorimetry integrated with reflectance UV-visible spectrometer (C-RUV) technique Li and Jang, 2012) was used to measure [H + ] (mol L −1 aerosol) in experiment SA2. The C-RUV technique utilizes a dyed filter to collect aerosol and act as an indicator for particle acidity.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The colorimetry integrated with reflectance UV-visible spectrometer (C-RUV) technique Li and Jang, 2012) was used to measure [H + ] (mol L −1 aerosol) in experiment SA2. The C-RUV technique utilizes a dyed filter to collect aerosol and act as an indicator for particle acidity.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these results, it was assumed that presence of organics in isoprene SHMP SOA does not significantly influence the [H + ] from inorganic acids. Therefore, [H + ] is estimated for each time step by E-AIM II (Clegg et al, 1998) corrected for the ammonia-rich condition (Li and Jang, 2012) and RH. Then, [H + ] is diluted using the ratio of the inorganic volume to the total aerosol volume.…”
Section: Aerosol Composition and Phase Statementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In (Clegg et al, 1998;Wexler and Clegg, 2002). In this study, [H + ] is estimated by E-AIM II (Clegg et al, 1998;Wexler and Clegg, 2002;Clegg and Wexler, 2011) and corrected for the ammonia-rich condition Li and Jang, 2012). The reported uncertainty in [H + ] associated with the C-RUV method is ±18 %.…”
Section: Sensitivity and Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In AMAR, aerosol acidity ([H + ]) is estimated at each time step by E-AIM II (Clegg et al, 1998;Wexler and Clegg, 2002;Clegg and Wexler, 2011) corrected for the ammonia-rich condition Beardsley and Jang, 2016;Li and Jang, 2012) as a function of inorganic composition measured by a particle-into-liquid sampler coupled with ion chromatography (PILS-IC). When the ammonia-to-sulfate ratio is greater than 0.8, the prediction of [H + ] is corrected based on the method described by Li and Jang (2012). At high NO x levels, NO − 2 (aq) competes with S(IV) (aq) for the reaction with OH(aq), O 3 , or H 2 O 2 (Table S1) (Ma et al, 2008).…”
Section: Amar Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direct filter sampling approach is challenged by the nature of hydrogen ion in that its concentration in a solution does not scale in proportion to the level of dilution, and is also subject to sampling errors (Hennigan et al, 2015). A few studies have determined the pH of laboratory generated particles using colorimetry/spectrometry and Raman microspectroscopy (Li and Jang, 2012;Rindelaub et al, 2016;Craig et al, 2017), but such techniques have not been applied to ambient particles partly due to their much more complex chemical and physical 15 properties. Therefore, an indirect (or proxy) method-thermodynamic equilibrium modeling-has been widely used to estimate particle pH for many regions of the world (Bougiatioti et al, 2016;Guo et al, 2017a;Parworth et al, 2017;Murphy et al, 2017;Yao et al, 2007;Zhang et al, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%