2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-008-9450-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerosol generation and measurement of multi-wall carbon nanotubes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen in Figure 5, the aerosol number concentration is stabilized at values close to 10,000 #/cm 3 for periods up to 12 h of continuous operation. In both cases, these numbers are well above those of previously reported aerosol generators based on fluidized bed technology (Prenni et al 2000;Myojo et al 2009;Denny et al 2010;Lind et al 2010). By using a continuous feeding system, generation of highly concentrated aerosols can be achieved over a period of several hours but the average particle size is usually larger than 1 μm (Vincent 2007), a value too large for studies of nanoparticle aerosols.…”
Section: Generation Of Nanoparticle Aerosolssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be seen in Figure 5, the aerosol number concentration is stabilized at values close to 10,000 #/cm 3 for periods up to 12 h of continuous operation. In both cases, these numbers are well above those of previously reported aerosol generators based on fluidized bed technology (Prenni et al 2000;Myojo et al 2009;Denny et al 2010;Lind et al 2010). By using a continuous feeding system, generation of highly concentrated aerosols can be achieved over a period of several hours but the average particle size is usually larger than 1 μm (Vincent 2007), a value too large for studies of nanoparticle aerosols.…”
Section: Generation Of Nanoparticle Aerosolssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Aerosol generation is a less common application but nevertheless fluidized beds have also been used for decades to generate aerosols of relatively coarse particles (Guichard 1976), and more recently for nanoparticles (Wang et al 1998;Yao et al 2002). Myojo et al (2009) reported the use of a fluidized bed to homogenize the supply of multi-walled carbon nanotubes from a rotating brush aerosol generator, giving concentrated carbon nanotube aerosols for limited experimental times (under 1 h of operation). Lind et al (2010) reported on the use of a glass-bead-fluidized bed for producing silica ultrafine particles (1 and 2.6 μm).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generator RBG-1000 has been used previously to generate a well dispersed carbon nanotube (CNT) aerosol. This dispersion had an average length of 4-6 lm, with 4 mg/m 3 mass concentration at a 2 mm/h feed rate (Myojo et al 2009). One technical limitation of this system is the brush speed which determines the momentum transfer to an aggregate/ agglomerate; this momentum, only once higher than the agglomerate/aggregate bond strength may break it into smaller pieces or its individual constituents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Baron et al (2008) generated aerosolized single-walled CNT (SWCNT) for inhalation study using mill and cyclone generator. Myojo et al (2009) also used a rotating brush aerosol generator and they controlled the number concentration of multiwalled CNT (MWCNT) aerosol up to 20,000 particles cm -3 . They succeeded in aerosolizing commercial MWCNT powder for an exposure study of mice, but the size distribution of generated test particles was too broad and filtration efficiency of these aerosols was not investigated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%