2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-015-3138-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Limited inflammatory response in rats after acute exposure to a silicon carbide nanoaerosol

Abstract: Inhalation represents the major route of human exposure to manufactured nanomaterials (NMs). Assessments are needed about the potential risks of NMs from inhalation on different tissues and organs, especially the respiratory tract. The aim of this limited study is to determine the potential acute pulmonary toxicity in rats exposed to a dry nanoaerosol of silicon carbide (SiC) nanoparticles (NPs) in a whole-body exposure (WBE) model. The SiC nanoaerosol is composed of a bimodal size distribution of 92.8 and 480… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…study also included a cull on day 7 post-final dose and both aerosol studies included cull groups on days 7 and 28 post-final dose. All control groups (saline or air treated) showed outcomes in line with values reported in literature [19,29,30], i.e., total cell counts were normal, and no inflammatory cells were present in the BAL cellular fraction (Figure 1). Regardless of the administration route, total BAL cell numbers did not increase in any of the amiodarone-treated groups tested (Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…study also included a cull on day 7 post-final dose and both aerosol studies included cull groups on days 7 and 28 post-final dose. All control groups (saline or air treated) showed outcomes in line with values reported in literature [19,29,30], i.e., total cell counts were normal, and no inflammatory cells were present in the BAL cellular fraction (Figure 1). Regardless of the administration route, total BAL cell numbers did not increase in any of the amiodarone-treated groups tested (Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%