2017
DOI: 10.5194/acp-17-13559-2017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aerosol trends as a potential driver of regional climate in the central United States: evidence from observations

Abstract: Abstract. In situ surface observations show that downward surface solar radiation (SWdn) over the central and southeastern United States (US) has increased by 0.58-1.0 Wm −2 a −1 over the 2000-2014 time frame, simultaneously with reductions in US aerosol optical depth (AOD) of 3.3-5.0 × 10 −3 a −1 . Establishing a link between these two trends, however, is challenging due to complex interactions between aerosols, clouds, and radiation. Here we investigate the clear-sky aerosol-radiation effects of decreasing U… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A continuous decrease of PM 2.5 from 2007 to 2014 at Baltimore, United States was found based on the monthly anomalies of PM 2.5 observations calculated from the EPA hourly average PM 2.5 ( Figure 1). A long-term decrease of aerosol loading in the recent decade was also found at other places in the United States in previous studies using different aerosol observations-AOD, PM 10 , or PM 2.5 [15,32,38]. Different from aerosols, there is no trend found for the CBH and LCL monthly anomalies from 2007 to 2014 (Figure 2a,b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…A continuous decrease of PM 2.5 from 2007 to 2014 at Baltimore, United States was found based on the monthly anomalies of PM 2.5 observations calculated from the EPA hourly average PM 2.5 ( Figure 1). A long-term decrease of aerosol loading in the recent decade was also found at other places in the United States in previous studies using different aerosol observations-AOD, PM 10 , or PM 2.5 [15,32,38]. Different from aerosols, there is no trend found for the CBH and LCL monthly anomalies from 2007 to 2014 (Figure 2a,b).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This research highlights an interesting aspect of climate in the region, namely that of the warming hole due to aerosol effects. There are dueling perspectives on climate and radiation impacts of aerosol effects from both natural and anthropogenic sources [29][30][31]. The research here does not necessarily seek to answer this debate, however, the hypothesis of Y. Lee et al [32] does offer intriguing insights into a future climate scenario where air pollution control policies may have in had an impact.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In contrast, the observational study of Tosca et al (2017) , which also relied on satellite AOD, pointed to aerosol–radiation interactions as the driver of surface temperature trends in the southeast. Analysis of ground-based observations in Mississippi, however, found little covariability between AOD and clear-sky solar radiation at the surface, casting doubt on the importance of aerosol–radiation interactions in driving the observed cooling in this region ( Cusworth et al, 2017 ).…”
Section: Chemistry–climate Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%