1995
DOI: 10.1016/s0955-3681(13)80301-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aesthesiometry after Cryo-keratomileusis and in situ Keratomileusis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Re-innervation of the corneal button and sensation recovery will also be limited, in a similar manner to keratoplasty. 99,100,101,102,103 For example, at 5 years post-epikeratoplasty, only minimal corneal sensitivity was measured in the central zone, but by 10 years post-operatively it had significantly returned. However, only 17.7% of eyes at 10 years had a normal central corneal sensitivity.…”
Section: Tectonic Overlay Grafts and Epikeratophakiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Re-innervation of the corneal button and sensation recovery will also be limited, in a similar manner to keratoplasty. 99,100,101,102,103 For example, at 5 years post-epikeratoplasty, only minimal corneal sensitivity was measured in the central zone, but by 10 years post-operatively it had significantly returned. However, only 17.7% of eyes at 10 years had a normal central corneal sensitivity.…”
Section: Tectonic Overlay Grafts and Epikeratophakiamentioning
confidence: 99%