2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2008.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aesthetic impact assessment of solar power plants: An objective and a subjective approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
66
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
66
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The main direct or indirectly derived advantages of solar energy are no emission of greenhouse or toxic gasses, reclamation of degraded land, reduction of transmission lines from electricity grids, and increase of regional/national energy independence. In addition, it can provide diversification and security of the energy supply, acceleration of rural electrification in developing countries, job opportunities, improvement of life quality in developing countries, and investment security for park development as solar panels are resistant to extreme climate conditions with a life expectancy greater than 35 years (Solangi et al, 2011;Tsoutsos et al, 2005;Torres-Sibille et al, 2009;Hernandez et al, 2014). However, conflicts can also arise between renewable energy and nature conservation policy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The main direct or indirectly derived advantages of solar energy are no emission of greenhouse or toxic gasses, reclamation of degraded land, reduction of transmission lines from electricity grids, and increase of regional/national energy independence. In addition, it can provide diversification and security of the energy supply, acceleration of rural electrification in developing countries, job opportunities, improvement of life quality in developing countries, and investment security for park development as solar panels are resistant to extreme climate conditions with a life expectancy greater than 35 years (Solangi et al, 2011;Tsoutsos et al, 2005;Torres-Sibille et al, 2009;Hernandez et al, 2014). However, conflicts can also arise between renewable energy and nature conservation policy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, conflicts can also arise between renewable energy and nature conservation policy. The environmental impacts from photovoltaic power generation include general effects on visual impact, land use intensity, wildlife impacts, reflection effects, depletion of natural resources, and waste management (Torres-Sibille et al, 2009;Tsoutsos et al, 2005;Turney and Ftenakis, 2011). Although the number of direct animal deaths at solar parks, is thought to be negligible (Katzner et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the literature [24] an indicator is proposed for the quantification of the objective aesthetic impact, based on four criteria: visibility, colour, factuality and concurrence between fixed and mobile panels. The relative importance of each variable and the corresponding value functions are calculated using expert contribution [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For solar energy installations [14], the aesthetic impacts of PV installations can be quantified based on four criteria: visibility, colour, fractality and concurrence between fixed and mobile panels. This study determined the overall impact by expert opinion through a Delphi procedure.…”
Section: Aesthetic Impactsmentioning
confidence: 99%