1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0757.1996.tb00186.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aesthetics and implant dentistry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ethical approval was obtained from the New Zealand Lower South Regional Ethics Committee, and all participants provided informed consent before entering the trial. Twenty-eight participants (mean age: 43 years; range: 23-71 years) requiring single implant crowns in the anterior maxilla (teeth [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] were recruited. The inclusion criteria included adequate bone volume to accommodate the implant (length: 10-15 mm; diameter: 2.5-4.0 mm), Lekholm and Zarb 28 class I to III bone quality at the implant recipient site by radiographic assessment, a healed recipient site, and adjacent mesial and distal teeth.…”
Section: Participant Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ethical approval was obtained from the New Zealand Lower South Regional Ethics Committee, and all participants provided informed consent before entering the trial. Twenty-eight participants (mean age: 43 years; range: 23-71 years) requiring single implant crowns in the anterior maxilla (teeth [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25] were recruited. The inclusion criteria included adequate bone volume to accommodate the implant (length: 10-15 mm; diameter: 2.5-4.0 mm), Lekholm and Zarb 28 class I to III bone quality at the implant recipient site by radiographic assessment, a healed recipient site, and adjacent mesial and distal teeth.…”
Section: Participant Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include, albeit controversially, parabolic implant design; [11][12][13] soft and hard tissue augmentation either prior to, concurrent with, and/or after implant placement; [14][15][16][17][18] and surgical incision techniques that preserve or create papillae. 19,20 Evidence sometimes suggests that these interventions do not improve soft tissue outcomes when compared to simple standardized surgical techniques. 17,18 Prosthodontic techniques to enhance soft tissue contour by using custom abutments and provisional crowns to support the peri-implant mucosa during healing have been described in case reports 14,21,22 and retrospective and prospective cohort studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Historically, removable provisionals, modification of the adjacent teeth, or no provisional were the only options available. As a greater understanding of osseointegration came about, dentistry became aware of the ability of a newly placed implant to favorably support a provisional prostheses, under properly controlled occlusal schemes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of interproximal papilla around implant-supported restorations allows symmetrical soft tissues margins and a state of harmony between natural teeth and dental implant components. 1 This harmony and tissue symmetry leads to natural looking restoration that does not obscure vision. On the contrary, slightest change in the level of the interproximal papilla can lead to major esthetic and phonetic complications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%