1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0163-4453(85)92463-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aetiology and outcome of severe community-acquired pneumonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 133 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
66
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The reasons for this are not fully understood but one implication is that the in-hospital population covered in one study may be the same as, or overlap with, the community population covered in another study. Criteria for ICU admission vary from hospital to hospital and, for example, intubation rates are quite different in separate ICU studies of CAP, ranging from 50% [25] to 100% [26] even within the same country. Thus different populations of patients may be being studied.…”
Section: Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reasons for this are not fully understood but one implication is that the in-hospital population covered in one study may be the same as, or overlap with, the community population covered in another study. Criteria for ICU admission vary from hospital to hospital and, for example, intubation rates are quite different in separate ICU studies of CAP, ranging from 50% [25] to 100% [26] even within the same country. Thus different populations of patients may be being studied.…”
Section: Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some 41 prospective studies of the aetiology of CAP in European countries have been published and form the basis for this section of the paper [1,2,4,5,25,26,. As indicated above, CAP in the community is the most difficult to define and study, and is therefore the least known with only eight studies published.…”
Section: Causative Pathogensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have investigated CAP prognosis factors [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12], and guidelines have been proposed by several medical societies to define the optimal management of patients with CAP [13][14][15][16][17].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many studies, the rate of microbial identification, even in the ICU, remains extremely low, ranging 10-30% [2][3][4][5][18][19][20].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This accentuates the importance of prompt, accurate diagnosis and severity of illness which approaches to decisions regarding the extremity of management. [19,20] 200 patients with CAP were enrolled in this study. The current study asserts that B/A ratio with 97.1 % sensitivity and 100 % specificity with AUC of 0.999 is a better marker for the deciding severity, need of ICU and development of any complications during the course of CAP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%