2019
DOI: 10.30557/qw000018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affect Recognition in Autism: A single case study on integrating a humanoid robot in a standard therapy

Abstract: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a multifaceted developmental disorder that comprises a mixture of social impairments, with deficits in many areas including the theory of mind, imitation, and communication. Moreover, people with autism have difficulty in recognising and understanding emotional expressions. We are currently working on integrating a humanoid robot within the standard clinical treatment offered to children with ASD to support the therapists. In this article, using the A-B-A' single case design, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In regards with social perception and similarly to other studies (Conti et al, 2019 ; Marino et al, 2020 ; Pop et al, 2013 ) AF and ToM were clearly improved for both groups, after the intervention. Both groups also presented significantly better performance, fewer errors and less completion time in IN which is an executive function highly related to social functioning and emotional competence (Li et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In regards with social perception and similarly to other studies (Conti et al, 2019 ; Marino et al, 2020 ; Pop et al, 2013 ) AF and ToM were clearly improved for both groups, after the intervention. Both groups also presented significantly better performance, fewer errors and less completion time in IN which is an executive function highly related to social functioning and emotional competence (Li et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The participants of these 38 studies were between 2 and 20 years old: The youngest participants of the studies were 2-14 years (rounded to full years) respectively (mean: 6, median: 5, standard deviation: 3; rounded to integers); the oldest participants of the studies were 2-20 years (rounded to full years) respectively (mean: 10, median: 10, standard deviation: 4). Two of the 38 studies included only one participant [13], [14]; for the remaining 36 studies we calculated the number of years between the youngest and the oldest child: it was 0 to 13 years respectively (mean: 5, median: 5, standard deviation: 3; rounded to integers). The six studies providing information on the age of the participants -but neither the exact ages nor the age ranges -either provided the mean age of the participants (9.03 years [15], 10 years [16], 11.4 years [17], 2.5 years [18]), the mean age and the standard deviation (5.4±1.5 years [19]), or the inclusion criteria regarding age (6-9 years [20]).…”
Section: ) Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children with ASD [10], [12], [13], [15]- [17], [19], [21]- [43] Children with autism [7]- [9], [12], [13], [19], [20], [34], [37], [41], [42], [44]- [47] Autistic children [8], [15], [19], [20], [36], [46], [48]- [52] Children on/with autism spectrum [22], [53] ASD children [54] Autism children [51] TD children [10], [12], [19], [21], [24], [26], [43], [47], [52] Normal children [8], [20], [36], [49], [51] Neurotypical children [13], [16], [23], [50] Typical individuals…”
Section: Wording Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations