2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2016.07.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affection of Cu content on the phase evolution during the dealloying of Ag-Cu alloys using electrochemical noise with Hilbert spectra analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li, Moshrefi, Lara-Banda, Chui, and Liu [35,[108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116] agree with the method to determine passivation and metastable pitting. Asfia et al also determined that is a good option to eliminate trend without eliminating corrosion data [105,114,117] and that it is helpful to determine corrosion mechanisms in distinct media [118][119][120]. Various authors indicate that the interpretation of wavelet is more useful to determinate corrosion mechanism that statistical methods [110,111].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li, Moshrefi, Lara-Banda, Chui, and Liu [35,[108][109][110][111][112][113][114][115][116] agree with the method to determine passivation and metastable pitting. Asfia et al also determined that is a good option to eliminate trend without eliminating corrosion data [105,114,117] and that it is helpful to determine corrosion mechanisms in distinct media [118][119][120]. Various authors indicate that the interpretation of wavelet is more useful to determinate corrosion mechanism that statistical methods [110,111].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the alloy phase diagram in Figure 4e, there are two alloy phases in Ag−Cu alloy: one is the α phase poor in Cu, and the other is the β phase rich in Cu. It has been reported that an increasing content of Cu in Ag−Cu alloy leads to an increased corrosion rate, 34 which means more active electrochemical properties of the β phase compared with the α phase. These two phases divide the alloy and interface into different electrochemical regions, as shown in Figure 4c,d of Ag and Cu makes Cu dissolve preferentially before Ag in Ag−Cu alloy due to the galvanic reaction in the interface, and this phenomenon has been proved by the studies of Assaf et al 35 With H 2 O molecules as the electrolyte in the interface between the top alloy electrode and the switching layer, the oxidation reaction rate of Cu in the β phase will be accelerated greatly.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the alloy phase diagram in Figure e, there are two alloy phases in Ag–Cu alloy: one is the α phase poor in Cu, and the other is the β phase rich in Cu. It has been reported that an increasing content of Cu in Ag–Cu alloy leads to an increased corrosion rate, which means more active electrochemical properties of the β phase compared with the α phase. These two phases divide the alloy and interface into different electrochemical regions, as shown in Figure c,d.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dealloying by free corrosion in an aqueous solution has already been studied by various methods such as in situ electrochemical noise or Raman spectroscopy, for example [4,[21][22][23]. It was even 3D imaged in situ to study the evolution of the dealloying front and coarsening and the effect of different parameters on the dealloying process such as precursor composition or acid concentration [24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%