2008
DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affective and cognitive meta-bases of attitudes: Unique effects on information interest and persuasion.

Abstract: The authors investigated the predictive utility of people's subjective assessments of whether their evaluations are affect- or cognition driven (i.e., meta-cognitive bases) as separate from whether people's attitudes are actually affect- or cognition based (i.e., structural bases). Study 1 demonstrated that meta-bases uniquely predict interest in affective versus cognitive information above and beyond structural bases and other related variables (i.e., need for cognition and need for affect). In Study 2, meta-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
116
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
11
116
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In their article, Fabrigar and Petty (1999) showed that emotional appeal (vs. cognitive appeal) in an ad is more persuasive for consumers whose existing attitudes are based on affective (vs. cognitive) process. In fact, a mere perception concerning one's attitude could influence one's interest for affective-or cognitive-related information (See et al 2008). Finally, different message framing (e.g., "I feel…" vs. "I think…") could also influence the persuasion effectiveness such that feel (vs. think) framing is more persuasive for consumers who are affectively (vs. cognitively) oriented (Mayer and Tormala 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In their article, Fabrigar and Petty (1999) showed that emotional appeal (vs. cognitive appeal) in an ad is more persuasive for consumers whose existing attitudes are based on affective (vs. cognitive) process. In fact, a mere perception concerning one's attitude could influence one's interest for affective-or cognitive-related information (See et al 2008). Finally, different message framing (e.g., "I feel…" vs. "I think…") could also influence the persuasion effectiveness such that feel (vs. think) framing is more persuasive for consumers who are affectively (vs. cognitively) oriented (Mayer and Tormala 2010).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…De este modo, un mensaje afectivo puede ser percibido como cognitivo, como, por ejemplo, en personas cuya forma de pensar en general remite a esta última forma más que a otras (e.g., thinkers). De hecho, recientes investigaciones han mostrado que en condiciones de alta probabilidad de elaboración el emparejamiento es más efectivo cuando se realiza sobre la percepción del origen de la actitud (afectivo o cognitivo) y no sobre la base misma (See, Petty & Fabrigar, 2008). Así, en las mismas condiciones de elaboración del presente trabajo podrían haberse encontrado efectos de los mensajes utilizados si la forma de evaluación hubiese incluido en el análisis medidas de la percepción de origen de la actitud como un factor.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Using this approach, the authors found affective matching effects along with a non-significant tendency toward cognitive matching effects. More recently, See, Petty, and Fabrigar (2008) investigated affective and cognitive matching effects by measuring structural attitude bases instead of manipulating informational attitude bases. Structural attitude bases are conceptualized as a global tendency of individuals to base their attitudes on either affect or cognition.…”
Section: Research On Affective and Cognitive Matching Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%