2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2019.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Affine walled Brauer–Clifford superalgebras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, if A = Cl is the two-dimensional Clifford superalgebra, then gl m|n (Cl) is isomorphic to the queer Lie superalgebra q(m + n), and our functors recover those defined in [BCK19]. As in the A = k case, these functors extend Schur-Weyl duality results for queer Lie superalgebras [Ser84b], actions of walled Brauer-Clifford superalgebras [JK14], and actions of affine walled Brauer-Clifford superalgebras [BCK19,GRSS19]. In fact, the Clifford superalgebra is the main example of interest where the Frobenius superalgebra is not symmetric.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…On the other hand, if A = Cl is the two-dimensional Clifford superalgebra, then gl m|n (Cl) is isomorphic to the queer Lie superalgebra q(m + n), and our functors recover those defined in [BCK19]. As in the A = k case, these functors extend Schur-Weyl duality results for queer Lie superalgebras [Ser84b], actions of walled Brauer-Clifford superalgebras [JK14], and actions of affine walled Brauer-Clifford superalgebras [BCK19,GRSS19]. In fact, the Clifford superalgebra is the main example of interest where the Frobenius superalgebra is not symmetric.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…, δ ⌊ℓ/2⌋ ∈ k, and define δ k for k > ⌊ℓ/2⌋ by (7.1). In [GRSS1,Definition 3.14] the cyclotomic walled Brauer-Clifford superalgebra BC ℓ,r,s is defined as the quotient of BC r,s by the additional relations f (x 1 ) = g(x 1 ) = 0 where g(t) is another monic degree ℓ polynomial satisfying certain conditions. One can check that those conditions imply f (x 1 ) and…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 we observe two scenarios: i) WMSN optimized according to method B with P ref = 0.01 and ii) Similar to i) but with P ref = 0.05. In both scenarios the trajectories of MSNs sharing the same path are synchronized and we set g = 8000, see (23).…”
Section: Simulations Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where both g > 0 and P ref are the design parameters. The first term in (23) is the network ef f iciency while the second term is the penalization term. Regarding the penalization term note that: when g → +∞, the penalization term subtracts infinity to the optimization target ifP GP A > P ref but has negligible effect ifP GP A < P ref ; when v k → 0 the network efficiency tends to +∞ at the following rate 1/v 2 k but the penalization term tends to −∞ at an exponential rate (see (20), (21) and Fig.…”
Section: B Msn's Trajectory Configurationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation