2011
DOI: 10.3923/javaa.2011.2047.2050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aflatoxin M1 Contamination of Ice Cream in Samsun, Turkey

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the number of tested samples significantly differs and the data series may not be fully comparable. However, the published studies of Cadirci et al (2011) and Nilchian and Rahimi (2012) reported low AFM 1 contamination rates. In the report from Cadirci et al (2011) accounted for 120 samples from Samsun, Turkey, the revealed positive samples were 26.08% with detected range of 6.12-32.15 ng/kg and average of 14.67 ng/kg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the number of tested samples significantly differs and the data series may not be fully comparable. However, the published studies of Cadirci et al (2011) and Nilchian and Rahimi (2012) reported low AFM 1 contamination rates. In the report from Cadirci et al (2011) accounted for 120 samples from Samsun, Turkey, the revealed positive samples were 26.08% with detected range of 6.12-32.15 ng/kg and average of 14.67 ng/kg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, the published studies of Cadirci et al (2011) and Nilchian and Rahimi (2012) reported low AFM 1 contamination rates. In the report from Cadirci et al (2011) accounted for 120 samples from Samsun, Turkey, the revealed positive samples were 26.08% with detected range of 6.12-32.15 ng/kg and average of 14.67 ng/kg. In the study published by Nilchian and Rahimi (2012), for 40 tested ice cream samples with origin from Shahrekord in Iran, 29% positive samples were detected with a mean 65.1 ng/kg and detected maximum of 197.4 ng/kg.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%