2004
DOI: 10.1079/pgr200440
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AFLP characterization and genetic diversity analysis of Indian banana and plantain cultivars (Musa spp.)

Abstract: DNA profiles of 92 banana and plantain cultivars were generated with 12 amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) primer pairs. The average polymorphism information content (PIC) values of the polymorphic AFLP markers varied from 0.270 to 0.341, and the profiles could distinguish all the 92 cultivars analysed. It was possible to identify differences between two accessions of the AAB genome cultivar Rasthali, indicating the presence of intra-cultivar genetic variation. A UPGMA (unweighted pair group method … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Close genetic relationship among the cultivars, as well as somatic mutations, contribute further obstacles to the correct identification of the clones (Kahangi, 2002). Hence, molecular markers including microsatellites, RAPD, and AFLP have been used to characterize banana cultivars from Kenya, Bazil, and India (Creste et al, 2004;Onguso et al, 2004;Bhat et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Close genetic relationship among the cultivars, as well as somatic mutations, contribute further obstacles to the correct identification of the clones (Kahangi, 2002). Hence, molecular markers including microsatellites, RAPD, and AFLP have been used to characterize banana cultivars from Kenya, Bazil, and India (Creste et al, 2004;Onguso et al, 2004;Bhat et al, 2004).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It confirms the capacity of the plants to modify trait expression, as a consequence of environmental changes; this phenomenon is called phenotypic plasticity (DeWitt and Scheiner 2004). Although plasticity is a desirable attribute for plant adaptation, it confounds population characterization in genebanks (Lombard et al 2001;Nuel et al 2001;Bhat et al 2004). Thus, it is important to identify the most stable traits for morphological characterization.…”
Section: Comparison Of Means Between Years and Between Planting Datesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of an appropriate molecular marker depends on many considerations, with no single approach optimal for studying infraspecific variation or for solving the needs of ex situ germplasm conservation (Spooner et al 2005), such as the identification of duplicate accessions and gaps in genebank collections or the development of effective regeneration systems. Important classes of DNA-based molecular markers, which have been used for genetic-diversity assessment, cultivar fingerprinting, and phylogenetic studies, include AFLPs, as well as restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLP), random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD), and single sequence repeats (SSR) (Brown et al 1996;Heslop-Harrison and Schwarzacher 1996;Penner 1996;Reiter 2001;de Vienne et al 2003;Bhat et al 2004). Briefly, AFLP is a PCR-based molecular-marker class (Vos et al 1995), typically considered within the group of dominant sequence polymorphisms (de Vienne et al 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Researchers have used several DNA fingerprinting techniques for the correct identification of plant species and cultivars. These DNA fingerprinting techniques have successfully used markers such as randomly amplified polymorphic DNA marker (RAPD) (Toral Ibañez et al, 2009;Ude et al, 2003;Gawel and Jarret, 1992), restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) (Bhat et al, 1995), microsatellites (Grapin et al, 1998), inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) (Godwin et al, 1997), and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) (Bhat et al, 2004;Ude et al, 2003). Among many researchers, AFLP is the marker technology of choice since it combines the reliability of classical restriction-based fingerprinting with the speed and convenience of polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based marker techniques (Vos et al, 1995;Powell et al, 1996;Lu et al, 2002;Ude et al, 2002a;2002b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%