2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.09.077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AFM characterization of nanobubble formation and slip condition in oxygenated and electrokinetically altered fluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
48
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
5
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Saline 1 and saline 2 shows larger and fewer nanobubbles on the PS film compared with DI and saline. Reproduced with permission from [55]. Copyright (2013) Elsevier.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Saline 1 and saline 2 shows larger and fewer nanobubbles on the PS film compared with DI and saline. Reproduced with permission from [55]. Copyright (2013) Elsevier.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aggregation may lead to the discontinuous increase of the average diameter of nanobubbles in saline 2, which has a small total count of nanobubbles at a voltage of 60 V (Fig. 15) [55]. …”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the suggestion by Parker et al in 1994 [1] on the presence of stable nanobubbles on a hydrophobic surface, they have been directly observed with scanning atomic force microscopy (AFM) since 2000 [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Nanobubbles are usually formed by the exchange of a short-chain alcohol with water on a solid substrate called the standard solvent exchange procedure [6,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detailed process to prepare RNS60 is described in our previous work. 49 The process to prepare the PS sample was the same as our previous method 11 and is as follows. First, a 1 cm × 1 cm substrate of Si wafer (Silicon Quest International) with 300 nm thick silicon oxide coating was first immersed in a piranha solution of a 3:1 (volume ratio) mixture of 98% sulfuric acid and 30% hydrogen peroxide for 30 min, and then rinsed by DI water followed by ethanol at least five times and dried with clean compressed air.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%