1992
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-3472(06)80002-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age and foraging success in European blackbirds: variation between and with individuals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reports that foraging efficiency often improves with age support the idea that foraging strategies are partly learned (e.g. [9597]).…”
Section: Applications To Learning Phenomenamentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Reports that foraging efficiency often improves with age support the idea that foraging strategies are partly learned (e.g. [9597]).…”
Section: Applications To Learning Phenomenamentioning
confidence: 90%
“…For example, individual selection preference based on 100 used trees counted twice as much as one based on only 50 trees. Consequently, each woodpecker individual contributed only 1 degree of freedom in the model regardless of its number of observations (Desrochers 1992). This approach allowed us to use all observations while avoiding pseudo-replication (Machlis et al 1985).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Selected Foraging Substratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three nonexclusive hypotheses exist to explain the poorer performance of younger breeders. The first is the constraint hypothesis (Curio 1983), which states that individuals gain experience and skills over the years (e.g., Nol and Smith 1987, Desrochers 1992, De Forest and Gaston 1996. On the other hand, the restraint hypothesis (Curio 1983) suggests that younger breeders that have higher residual reproductive value than older individuals should reduce their reproductive effort to avoid incurring high survival costs (e.g., Ericsson et al 2001, Velando et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%