2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age differences in understanding precedent-setting decisions and authorities’ responses to violations of deontic rules

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For analyses of age differences, a median split was used to create middle ( N = 164; M = 13.45 years; SD = .74 years) and (relatively) late ( N = 171; M = 16.14 years; SD = .85 years) adolescent groups. These groups allow for comparisons to the only other developmental study of adolescents’ obesity stereotypes of which we are aware (i.e., Klaczynski et al ., ) and to research revealing differences in the decisions, judgements, and reasoning of early, middle, and late adolescents (e.g., Chiesi, Primi, & Morsanyi, ; Klaczynski, ; Klaczynski & Felmban, ; Markovits & Vachon, ; Toplak, West, & Stanovich, ; Ward & Overton, )…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For analyses of age differences, a median split was used to create middle ( N = 164; M = 13.45 years; SD = .74 years) and (relatively) late ( N = 171; M = 16.14 years; SD = .85 years) adolescent groups. These groups allow for comparisons to the only other developmental study of adolescents’ obesity stereotypes of which we are aware (i.e., Klaczynski et al ., ) and to research revealing differences in the decisions, judgements, and reasoning of early, middle, and late adolescents (e.g., Chiesi, Primi, & Morsanyi, ; Klaczynski, ; Klaczynski & Felmban, ; Markovits & Vachon, ; Toplak, West, & Stanovich, ; Ward & Overton, )…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Klaczynski (2011) demonstrated that, in the absence or presence of mitigating circumstances surrounding a rule infraction, preadolescents and adolescents reacted very differently. Adolescents were more likely to recommend punishment to student rule-breaking behavior when there was an absence of mitigating factors.…”
Section: Development Of Cognitive Processes In Adolescentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of researchers have asserted that classroom instruction and behavior management should be aligned with students’ cognitive development and abilities (Bruner, 1960; Klaczynski, 2011; Paterson, Heim, Friedman, Choudhury, & Benasich, 2006). For example, Klaczynski (2011) demonstrated that, in the absence or presence of mitigating circumstances surrounding a rule infraction, preadolescents and adolescents reacted very differently. Adolescents were more likely to recommend punishment to student rule-breaking behavior when there was an absence of mitigating factors.…”
Section: Development Of Cognitive Processes In Adolescentsmentioning
confidence: 99%