Age Effects on Upper Limb Kinematics Assessed by the REAplan Robot in Healthy Subjects Aged 3 to 93 Years

Abstract

Kinematics is recommended for the quantitative assessment of upper limb movements. The aims of this study were to determine the age effects on upper limb kinematics and establish normative values in healthy subjects. Three hundred and seventy healthy subjects, aged 3-93 years, participated in the study. They performed two unidirectional and two geometrical tasks ten consecutive times with the REAplan, a distal effector robotic device that allows upper limb displacements in the horizontal plane. Twenty-six kinematic indices were computed for the four tasks. For the four tasks, nineteen of the computed kinematic indices showed an age effect. Seventeen indices (the accuracy, speed and smoothness indices and the reproducibility of the accuracy, speed and smoothness) improved in young subjects aged 3-30 years, showed stabilization in adults aged 30-60 years and declined in elderly subjects aged 60-93 years. Additionally, for both geometrical tasks, the speed index exhibited a decrease throughout life. Finally, a principal component analysis provided the relations between the kinematic indices, tasks and subjects' age. This study is the first to assess age effects on upper limb kinematics and establish normative values in subjects aged 3-93 years.

Differentiating Motor Coordination and Position Sense in Children with Cerebral Palsy and Typically Developing Populations Through Robotic Assessments

“…The algorithm fit a quadratic curve model relative to age, and includes dummy coded variables (0 or 1) for sex and handedness. Quadratic age curves were chosen to model typically developing data as they have been successfully used in previous studies to quantify age-related changes to motor function [3]. Changing variability in performance with age was taken into account by fitting a linear model to the absolute value of the residuals.…”

“…Motor function and coordination develop and improve in a non-linear fashion as children grow; development is initially rapid and slows with age [1][2][3]. Variability in motor function also decreases with age [4][5][6].…”

“…There are many wellestablished developmental milestones linked to coordination based on clinical assessments [7]. Robotic assessments have also been used to create developmental curves relating development to age [2,3,8]. Robotic assessments offer highly repeatable, objective, and accurate results for testing different aspects of motor function and coordination [9].…”

Evidence of Motor Skill Learning in Acute Stroke Patients Without Lesions to the Thalamus and Internal Capsule

“…On the first experimental day (D1), the patients/HIs trained their paretic/nondominant UL on a MSkL task with an SAT (CIRCUIT) 20 , 21 that was implemented on a REAplan neurorehabilitation robot 22 , 23 (Axinesis, Wavre, Belgium; used for motor measures: throughout the study, it did not deliver assistance). To quantify motor control within the same environment, they performed a REACHING task on each day.…”

Tools and Techniques Used With Robotic Devices to Quantify Upper-Limb Function in Typically Developing Children: A Systematic Review

“…2,3 Robotic quantification of the adult population is straightforward as motor control parameters across the ages from 30 to 60 years display little variation. 8 To identify pathological differences in motor control, the clinician or researcher can readily compare robotic outcome measures to a general database of members within the typical population. However, as children grow, motor control improves, making it difficult to generalize the parameters associated with each age.…”