2012
DOI: 10.1007/s10862-012-9287-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-neutrality of the NEO-PI-R: Potential Differential Item Functioning in Older Versus Younger Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
12
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with the previous research on “heterotypic continuity,” we expected DIF for items that show lack of face validity, that is, items containing context factors that are not applicable to older age groups such as work, school, family, or origin (Balsis et al ., 2007; Van den Broeck et al ., 2012). However, none of the YSQL2 items concerning occupation, school, family, or origin contains DIF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In line with the previous research on “heterotypic continuity,” we expected DIF for items that show lack of face validity, that is, items containing context factors that are not applicable to older age groups such as work, school, family, or origin (Balsis et al ., 2007; Van den Broeck et al ., 2012). However, none of the YSQL2 items concerning occupation, school, family, or origin contains DIF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, emotion regulation seems to improve in adults and older adults (Carstensen et al ., 2003). The lower score on Enmeshment seems to be in accordance with the findings on changes in Big Five personality traits throughout the lifespan characterized by a decrease of neuroticism (or increase of emotional stability), extraversion and openness to experience, and an increase of agreeableness and conscientiousness (Costa et al ., 1986; Van den Broeck et al ., 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, in the DSM-5 proposal, severity dimensions in PD diagnosis, although posed to be helpful, are also poised to be problematic. Do we have enough information about the kinds of severity and expressions of PD in old age (see Van Alphen et al, 2012b)? In what kind of context, for example, compared with younger adults or even compared with peer groups of healthy older adults, do we apply the severity appraisal?…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DTF was found on the "Entitlement" scale, meaning that this YSQ scale is less suitable for clinical use in older adults [25]. With respect to the NEO-PI-R, a high degree of DIF for 17 items (7.1 %) and high DTF on the "Extraversion" scale was found; this scale should therefore be applied with caution [26]. Finally, on the PID-5, DIF was found for 30 items (13.6 %) and high DTF was found for the PID-5 scales "Withdrawal," "Attention Seeking," "Rigid Perfectionism," and "Unusual Beliefs" [27].…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 92%