Age-Patterns of Malaria Vary with Severity, Transmission Intensity and Seasonality in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

Abstract

BackgroundThere is evidence that the age-pattern of Plasmodium falciparum malaria varies with transmission intensity. A better understanding of how this varies with the severity of outcome and across a range of transmission settings could enable locally appropriate targeting of interventions to those most at risk. We have, therefore, undertaken a pooled analysis of existing data from multiple sites to enable a comprehensive overview of the age-patterns of malaria outcomes under different epidemiological conditions in sub-Saharan Africa.Methodology/Principal FindingsA systematic review using PubMed and CAB Abstracts (1980–2005), contacts with experts and searching bibliographies identified epidemiological studies with data on the age distribution of children with P. falciparum clinical malaria, hospital admissions with malaria and malaria-diagnosed mortality. Studies were allocated to a 3×2 matrix of intensity and seasonality of malaria transmission. Maximum likelihood methods were used to fit five continuous probability distributions to the percentage of each outcome by age for each of the six transmission scenarios. The best-fitting distributions are presented graphically, together with the estimated median age for each outcome. Clinical malaria incidence was relatively evenly distributed across the first 10 years of life for all transmission scenarios. Hospital admissions with malaria were more concentrated in younger children, with this effect being even more pronounced for malaria-diagnosed deaths. For all outcomes, the burden of malaria shifted towards younger ages with increasing transmission intensity, although marked seasonality moderated this effect.ConclusionsThe most severe consequences of P. falciparum malaria were concentrated in the youngest age groups across all settings. Despite recently observed declines in malaria transmission in several countries, which will shift the burden of malaria cases towards older children, it is still appropriate to target strategies for preventing malaria mortality and severe morbidity at very young children who will continue to bear the brunt of malaria deaths in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Evaluating antidisease immunity to malaria and implications for vaccine design

“…In the high‐transmission areas, however, this is often not the case, as higher parasite prevalence is observed in a healthy state,95 and most importantly higher parasitaemias are observed during clinical bouts of uncomplicated malaria 58, 97. In addition, cerebral malaria is the commonest severe form of malaria in the low transmission areas, whereas malarial anaemia is the dominant severe form in the high‐transmission areas, buttressing the notion of exposure induced clinical disparity of malaria 96, 98…”

Force of infection is key to understanding the epidemiology ofPlasmodium falciparummalaria in Papua New Guinean children

“…Whereas the relationship between transmission intensity and the burden of malaria illness is increasingly well described and understood on global (Malaria Atlas Project populations) or continental (African) scales (15,16), it has been much more difficult to relate local variation in malaria burden to transmission. On the Kenyan coast, locally estimated EIRs were found to be only weakly or not associated with prevalence of infection (17,18) or incidence of severe disease (17).…”

Synergistic and antagonistic interactions between bednets and vaccines in the control of malaria

“…This signature of immunity is a well-known epidemiological pattern characteristic to all immunizing infections (48). Specifically for Pf, peak prevalence of the parasite shifts to younger age groups as transmission intensity increases (10,11,40), whereas morbidity in the overall host population shifts to older age classes in areas of low-to-moderate transmission (10,49). This outcome is relevant for control because it delineates the groups that are most at risk from clinical disease (35,50); it also implies that reductions of transmission intensity through any form of control will lead to age-dependent shifts in malaria morbidity, from the young children to the older age classes (45,51,52).…”