2016
DOI: 10.1186/s13041-016-0191-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-related changes in behavior in C57BL/6J mice from young adulthood to middle age

Abstract: BackgroundAging is considered to be associated with progressive changes in the brain and its associated sensory, motor, and cognitive functions. A large number of studies comparing young and aged animals have reported differences in various behaviors between age-cohorts, indicating behavioral dysfunctions related to aging. However, relatively little is known about behavioral changes from young adulthood to middle age, and the effect of age on behavior during the early stages of life remains to be understood. I… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

68
326
11

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 370 publications
(405 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
68
326
11
Order By: Relevance
“…In Experiment 2, the mice were tested at 7 months old in the Porsolt forced swim test and at 21 to 23 months old in the fear conditioning test, while in Experiment 1, the ages of mice were 3 months in the Porsolt forced swim test and 7 months in the fear conditioning test. Consistent with our previous report showing age‐related changes in behaviors, in this study, immobility and freezing were lower in older mice in Experiment 2 than in younger mice in Experiment 1. Thus, no differences in the behaviors between aluminum‐ and vehicle‐treated mice in Experiment 2 might be potentially due to a floor effect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In Experiment 2, the mice were tested at 7 months old in the Porsolt forced swim test and at 21 to 23 months old in the fear conditioning test, while in Experiment 1, the ages of mice were 3 months in the Porsolt forced swim test and 7 months in the fear conditioning test. Consistent with our previous report showing age‐related changes in behaviors, in this study, immobility and freezing were lower in older mice in Experiment 2 than in younger mice in Experiment 1. Thus, no differences in the behaviors between aluminum‐ and vehicle‐treated mice in Experiment 2 might be potentially due to a floor effect.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This early FC decline accords with previously suggested trajectories of cognitive and structural deterioration with aging (Buckner, 2004; Park and Reuter-Lorenz, 2009; Giorgio et al, 2010; Chen et al, 2013). Furthermore, several recent studies explicitly underscored a detectable cognitive decline by middle-age in both humans (Singh-Manoux et al, 2012; Ferreira et al, 2015) and animals (Moore et al, 2006; Stouffer and Yoder, 2011; Shoji et al, 2016), supporting the view that connectivity decreases in specific functional brain systems may be associated with particular behavioral changes (Andrews-Hanna et al, 2007; Onoda et al, 2012). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…As the animal background strain and the (relatively high-carbohydrate and low-fat) standard lab diets used were similar in the two studies, it may be speculated that an age-related general decay in mobility (cf. [32]) accounts for the somewhat more pronounced—although still modest—adiposity observed in the older mice. For comparison, feeding our Gpr55 KO mice a high-caloric (high-fat, high-carbohydrate) content diet for 7 months did not influence body weight gain, but showed a small, non-significant trend towards increased adiposity across body weight in the Gpr55 KO mice vs .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%