2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-018-1102-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-related changes in the temporal focus and self-referential content of spontaneous cognition during periods of low cognitive demand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
5
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By relating the amount of time an individual spent in specific neural states to the pattern of thoughts reported at the end of the scan, we highlighted many of the themes of self-generated thought that are common within the literature. For example, patterns of future problem solving identified in our study are consistent with a prospective bias to ongoing thought that develops in young adulthood (McCormack et al, 2019;Irish et al, 2019) and is common in multiple cultures (Australia, Irish et al, 2019;Belgium, Stawarczyk et al, 2013;China, Song and Wang, 2012;Germany, Ruby et al, 2013;Japan, Iijima and Tanno, 2012;U.K. Smallwood et al, 2009;USA, Baird et al, 2011;Seli et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…By relating the amount of time an individual spent in specific neural states to the pattern of thoughts reported at the end of the scan, we highlighted many of the themes of self-generated thought that are common within the literature. For example, patterns of future problem solving identified in our study are consistent with a prospective bias to ongoing thought that develops in young adulthood (McCormack et al, 2019;Irish et al, 2019) and is common in multiple cultures (Australia, Irish et al, 2019;Belgium, Stawarczyk et al, 2013;China, Song and Wang, 2012;Germany, Ruby et al, 2013;Japan, Iijima and Tanno, 2012;U.K. Smallwood et al, 2009;USA, Baird et al, 2011;Seli et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…A range of cognitive tasks have been utilised, including vigilance tasks (e.g., signal detection tasks, Antrobus et al, 1966; line detection tasks, Plimpton et al, 2015, see also Giambra, 1995), reading tasks (Schooler, Reichle, & Halpern, 2005), go/no-go tasks (e.g., the Sustained Attention to Response Task, or SART, Robertson, Manly, Andrade, Baddeley, & Yiend, 1997;McVay & Kane, 2009), or choice reaction time tasks (Baird et al, 2011). In addition, O'Callaghan and colleagues have recently developed a novel shape expectations task, which may be particularly useful in studying spontaneous thoughts in ageing and clinical populations (O'Callaghan, Shine, Lewis, Andrews-Hanna, & Irish, 2015; O'Callaghan, Shine, Hodges, Andrews-Hanna, & Irish, 2019) (see also Irish, Goldberg, Alaeddin, O'Callaghan, & Andrews-Hanna, 2019). Generally, tasks that require rapid perceptual processing (e.g., fast presentation rate, see Antrobus et al, 1966) and tax cognitive resources (see McVay & Kane, 2009) reduce frequencies of spontaneous thought, although how this relates to spontaneous future thought is an open question (but is addressed in Mazzoni, 2019, andBarzykowski, Radel, Niedźwieńska, &; see also Smallwood et al, 2009).…”
Section: Laboratory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All three types of methods described above, have been used in the studies included in this issue, and several new variations of existing methods have also been reported to enable researchers to study spontaneous future thinking in very young children (Caza & Atance, 2018), older children and adolescents (McCormack et al, 2019) and older adults inside the laboratory (Jordão et al, 2019) and in everyday life (Warden et al, 2019). The development of new methods and techniques will inevitably stimulate further research on spontaneous future thinking (see e.g., O'Callaghan et al, 2015;Irish et al, 2019).…”
Section: Laboratory Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…≥90 s). The scoring procedure for this task has been described previously (32,63 bvFTD, 23 AD, and 32 controls. To identify regions where grey matter intensity covaried with mind wandering performance, a GLM was conducted in the patient groups combined (i.e., excluding controls), using the mind wandering index score as a covariate in the design matrix.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%