2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00426-021-01551-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age-related post-error slowing and stimulus repetition effect in motor inhibition during a stop-signal task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In sum, older adults were more affected, that is, they showed stronger slowing and greater response time changes across trials than younger adults. Our findings align with previous research and suggest coarser cognitive control adjustments with aging (Hsu & Hsieh, 2021;Rey-Mermet & Meier, 2015;Smith & Brewer, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In sum, older adults were more affected, that is, they showed stronger slowing and greater response time changes across trials than younger adults. Our findings align with previous research and suggest coarser cognitive control adjustments with aging (Hsu & Hsieh, 2021;Rey-Mermet & Meier, 2015;Smith & Brewer, 1995).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…While no significant differences were found in playback performance, a small but significant post-error slowing effect was found for the keys succeeding the altered auditory feedback compared to the keys preceding it. This is similar to the post-error slowing effect found in the stop-signal tasks - a common measure of prepotent response inhibition [ 51 , 52 ]. Therefore, despite no differences in musical performance between standard and altered auditory feedback, this paradigm captured a typical behavioural signature of error-making: a predictable deceleration in response time thought to index performance monitoring [ 53 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The age restriction could also be seen as a limitation. The main reason for the age limit was based on recent studies that suggest that inhibition mechanisms might be affected by aging, especially around and over the age of 60 [36,37]. To avoid any such potential age-related effects, we employed a strict age restriction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%