2019
DOI: 10.1111/csp2.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Age‐specific foraging strategies among pumas, and its implications for aiding ungulate populations through carnivore control

Abstract: Humans have been controlling carnivore numbers for centuries. Predator hunting, however, may indirectly influence predator‐prey dynamics unintentionally by influencing the age‐ and sex‐structure of predator populations that exhibit intraspecific (IS) variation in prey selection. We tested for IS in a small population of pumas in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem, United States, and identified foraging strategies shared by multiple individuals. Further, we tested extrinsic and intrinsic variables that explained… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because carnivore kill rates are difficult to obtain, most studies on carnivore foraging focus on prey composition (i.e., frequency of occurrence), and in some cases, biomass of prey species in a carnivore's diet. Many carnivores consume a wide range of prey, which evidence suggests is due to variable prey availability (Hayward et al 2006(Hayward et al , 2016, prey catchability/accessibility (Hopcraft et al 2005;Balme et al 2007), and the age or life history stage of the carnivore itself (Hayward et al 2007;Elbroch et al 2017a;Blecha et al 2018;Elbroch and Quigley 2019). When used in conjunction with prey availability, diet composition data enable researchers to estimate prey selection, or preference (Hayward et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because carnivore kill rates are difficult to obtain, most studies on carnivore foraging focus on prey composition (i.e., frequency of occurrence), and in some cases, biomass of prey species in a carnivore's diet. Many carnivores consume a wide range of prey, which evidence suggests is due to variable prey availability (Hayward et al 2006(Hayward et al , 2016, prey catchability/accessibility (Hopcraft et al 2005;Balme et al 2007), and the age or life history stage of the carnivore itself (Hayward et al 2007;Elbroch et al 2017a;Blecha et al 2018;Elbroch and Quigley 2019). When used in conjunction with prey availability, diet composition data enable researchers to estimate prey selection, or preference (Hayward et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, males feed from kills made by females within their territories in some systems, which may reduce their kill rates, while the reverse appears much less common (Elbroch et al 2017b). Subadult data were insufficient for analyses, but raw values of subadult kill rates were lower than for adults, matching recent research showing that subadults consume disproportionately more small-bodied, non-ungulate prey (Elbroch et al 2017a), and that pumas prey switch as they age and refine their hunting skills (Elbroch and Quigley 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…frequency of occurrence), and in some cases biomass of prey species in a carnivore's diet. Many carnivores consume a wide range of prey, which evidence suggests is due to variable prey availability (Hayward et al 2006;Hayward et al 2016), prey catchability/accessibility (Hopcraft et al 2005;Balme et al 2007), and the age or life history stage of the carnivore itself (Hayward et al 2007;Elbroch et al 2017a;Blecha et al 2018;Elbroch and Quigley 2019). When used in conjunction with prey availability, diet composition data enable researchers to estimate prey selection, or preference (Hayward et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) males would test positive for exposure to Y. pestis more than females because they interact with other unrelated pumas more often than females (Elbroch et al 2016); and (2) older pumas would exhibit a higher prevalence of antibodies to Y. pestis than younger pumas, as social interactions accumulate over time. In support of age-specific foraging influencing prevalence, we predicted younger pumas would test positive more often than older pumas because they eat more small prey (Elbroch & Quigley 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Nevertheless, we suggest future research continues to test whether diet explains patterns of plague among pumas, as we lacked suitable prey selection data across all pumas and all years of our study to conduct these analyses. There is new evidence that pumas exhibit intraspecific differences in diet due to age and behavioural stage (e.g., transient versus resident) (Elbroch et al 2017a, Elbroch & Quigley 2019. When programmed to acquire frequent fixes, new GPS collars also increase opportunities for researchers to conduct site investigations in order to document small puma prey (Elbroch et al 2018a).…”
Section: Environmental Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%