Agent‐Based Modeling of Temporal and Spatial Dynamics in Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment

Abstract

SummaryCurrent aggregate and top-down approaches in life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) generally fail to account for spatial, temporal, and emergent behavioral dynamics simultaneously during the inventory stage. We discuss the key characteristics captured by complex system approaches (agent-based modeling [ABM] in particular) in the context of LCSA. It is understood that by integrating ABM, temporal, spatial, and behavioral dynamics can be addressed during the life cycle inventory stage. We propose a general concept to integrate ABM into current building life cycle assessment standards. We then use a hypothetical example of green building development to compare the ABM approach with a predefined static policy model. Simulation results from the agent-based model confirm that there are temporal and spatial variations caused by behavioral dynamics. The results are integrated into the calculation of temporally dynamic LCSA indicators on an annual basis. Spatially distributed simulation results can also be used in spatially dynamic LCSA. Keywords:agent-based modeling complexity life cycle sustainability assessment life cycle inventory (LCI) green buildings industrial ecology Supporting information is linked to this article on the JIE website

From Cascade to Bottom-Up Ecosystem Services Model: How Does Social Cohesion Emerge from Urban Agriculture?

“…Future research could further develop our conceptual model using simulation tools. For example, future studies could construct an agent-based model using existing social complexity [86], social epidemiology [87,88], and LCA [89,90] literature and validate the structure and causality of our model [91] for different case studies.…”

Charting the Future of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: A Special Issue

“…), LCSA may also aim to increase the sophistication of existing models—refining spatial and temporal dimensions, for example—and/or combine and sometimes integrate LCA with different methods. In this special issue, Wu and colleagues (), Plevin (), and Kua () investigate options for enhancing the sophistication of existing life cycle and inclusion of other models.…”

“…; Grubert ); incorporating technological, economic, and political mechanisms at various levels of analysis through linking or integration of LCA with other types of models (Wu et al. ; Plevin ; Kua ); developing appropriate, preferably quantitative and practical, approaches for S‐LCA (Kühnen and Hahn ; Hardadi and Pizzol ; Corona et al. ; Suckling and Lee ).…”

“…incorporating technological, economic, and political mechanisms at various levels of analysis through linking or integration of LCA with other types of models (Wu et al. ; Plevin ; Kua );…”

Effects of technological development and electricity price reductions on adoption of residential heat pumps in Ontario, Canada

“…That is, the number of heat pumps in service is not prescribed, but rather estimated based on the influence of their improving performance and consequent economic feasibility. Changes over time in the relative economic performance of technologies, the likelihood that people will use them, and the environmental impacts associated with their use, are being tackled with a number of techniques including agent based modelling, behavioural models, and system dynamics, among others [3,4,25,45,46]. The use of SD constitutes a new and flexible approach to consequential LCA studies.…”