2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00191-011-0256-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agent-based modelling of novelty creating behavior and sectoral growth effects—Linking the creative and the destructive side of innovation

Abstract: For grasping the relationship between novelty creating activities of agents and growth of economic aggregates, a multi-level approach is suggested. The first level specifies the triggering conditions for novelty creating activities for the agents, i.e. firms. Here the behavioral elements and the modes of actions for the firms are portrayed using an agent-based approach (Section 2). On the second level, the consequences of successful innovations and imitations in a given sector of economic activities are dealt … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jager 2000; Beckenbach et al 2012). In this framework different modes compete to be activated by the agent due to endogenously generated forces.…”
Section: Specification Of Behavioral Entities (Agents)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Jager 2000; Beckenbach et al 2012). In this framework different modes compete to be activated by the agent due to endogenously generated forces.…”
Section: Specification Of Behavioral Entities (Agents)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Firms that succeed in identifying market needs have a comparative advantage over firms that are less successful in doing this (Beckenbach, Daskalakis, and Hofmann 2012).…”
Section: Firm Functions and Microfoundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, manufacturing and engineering expertise, quality assurance (Danneels 2002), production systems, and managerial systems with which to run development processes (Ellonen et al 2011) are the microfoundations on which the R&D function's capabilities build. Innovativeness requires firms both to overcome the routine modes of acting and to set higher goals and aspiration levels (Beckenbach et al 2012).…”
Section: Firm Functions and Microfoundationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the discrepancy between the desired and attained/anticipated target height is too great, and if lowering the target height to the level most probably attainable is not satisficing, a search process for innovation opportunities is conducted with the expectation that the desired aspiration level will be reached when these innovations are realised [for more detail, see Beckenbach et al (2012)]. In that sense, the goals of firms are the main driver of the initiation of innovation.…”
Section: The Carnegie School's Concept Of Initiation Of Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%