1999
DOI: 10.1109/5254.757631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agent communication languages: the current landscape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
112
0
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 334 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
112
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume, as in recent work in agent communications languages (Labrou et al 1999), that the language syntax comprises two layers: an inner layer in which the topics of conversation are represented formally, and an outer, or wrapper, layer comprising locutions which express the illocutionary force of the inner content. In our presentation of the axiomatic semantics we assume classical propositional logic as the formal representation of the inner layer, but this restriction is for simplicity of presentation only.…”
Section: Syntax Of Parmamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We assume, as in recent work in agent communications languages (Labrou et al 1999), that the language syntax comprises two layers: an inner layer in which the topics of conversation are represented formally, and an outer, or wrapper, layer comprising locutions which express the illocutionary force of the inner content. In our presentation of the axiomatic semantics we assume classical propositional logic as the formal representation of the inner layer, but this restriction is for simplicity of presentation only.…”
Section: Syntax Of Parmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume, as in recent work in agent communications languages (Labrou et al 1999), that the language syntax comprises two layers: an inner layer in which the topics of conversation are represented formally, and an outer, wrapper, layer comprising locutions which express the illocutionary force of the inner content.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(a) to extend the ACL speech act model [19,17] in order to take into account some useful notions suggested by human interaction, and (b) to make agent communication take place in the presence of a context, prescribing relations among, and actions upon, selected characteristics of speech acts.…”
Section: Agent Coordination Contextsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the design and development of multi-agent systems, communication and coordination among agents represent key issues [23,8,7,3,24]. As a consequence, agent communication languages (ACLs for short) have been the subject of intense research and debate in recent years [25,19,15,18,17,2]. ACLs specify a common syntax and semantics for messages exchanged, in order to allow a full comprehension of messages uttered by agents in terms of sender intentions/desires, information exchanged, symbols used, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another aspect of agent messaging is that these messages are typically written in an agent control language (ACL) 27 such as KQML or the FIPA ACL. These languages provide a structured means of exchanging information and knowledge among agents.…”
Section: Agent Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%