Agglomeration, Related Variety, and Vertical Integration

Abstract

Several recent studies have investigated the relationship between the geographic concentration of production and vertical integration, based on the hypothesis that the spatial agglomeration of firms in the same industry facilitates input procurement, thereby reducing the degree of vertical integration. This article contributes to this debate in two ways: first, we focus on interindustry vertical integration, and second, we consider the effects on vertical integration of unrelated and vertically related variety at the local level. The latter was measured using information from input-output tables and captured the opportunities for outsourcing within the local system. A data set of 24,663 Italian business groups in 2001 was used to estimate Tobit models to investigate the influence of vertically related variety and other agglomeration forces on the degree of vertical integration of groups. We found that vertical integration is influenced by industry specialization at the local level and that higher vertically related variety reduces the need for firms to integrate activities, since they have more opportunities to acquire intermediate goods and services within the local system. We analyze the manufacturing and different macroareas and show that this relationship is also influenced by technology and differences in the organization of economic activities at the local level.e cge_1156 255..277 255 ECONOMIC GEOGRAPHY 88(3):255-277.

Agglomeration and productivity in China: Firm level evidence

“…The agglomeration of upstream industries increases the varieties of inputs supplied, thereby contributing to the productivity of sourcing firms (Broda & Weinstein, 2006). It also allows firms to specialize in their core activities while outsourcing some of in-house production (Cainelli & Iacobucci, 2012;Holmes, 1999). Furthermore, stronger competition in upstream industries due to agglomeration can be associated with the supply of cheaper and better quality intermediate inputs.…”

Agglomeration economies in Italy: impact on heterogeneous firms’ exit in a multilevel framework

“…In the recent analyses of diversification, the role of related and unrelated variety is debated (Frenken et al 2007;Boschma and Iammarino 2009;Antonietti and Cainelli 2011;Cainelli and Iacobucci 2012). These contributions start from the argument that the transmission of knowledge requires a common and complementary competence base, i.e., it is not variety per se that matters, but the geographic concentration of firms in different but complementary or related industries.…”

Same Sea, Different Ponds: Cross-Sectorial Knowledge Spillovers in the North Sea

“…Empirical evidence for the related variety thesis is robust and mounting (Boschma & Frenken 2011). Existing "related variety" studies are mainly quantitative, in which relatedness tends to be approached from two angles (see Cainelli andIacobucci 2012, Boschma, Minondo andNavarro 2013). The first is associated with relatedness as conceptualised in cluster or agglomeration theory, where relatedness has to do with similarity of input or shared goods.…”

“…Related variety studies suggest that new industries are more successful when they evolve from the knowledge and resource base of existing industries (Boschma and Frenken 2011). However, there is no consistent way to measure industrial relatedness (see Cainelli andIacobucci 2012, Erlinghagen andMarkard 2012). Relatedness may be defined with regard to several different characteristics such as inputs, outputs and production methods.…”