1955
DOI: 10.1136/ard.14.3.243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agglutinins and Incomplete Antibodies after a Single Antigenic Inoculation in Normal and Rheumatic Individuals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1957
1957
1982
1982

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are exceptions, but, if rheumatics are considered as a group, this observation seems to hold true and it has led to an assumption that rheumatic individuals, that is, those who acquire rheumatic fever or are especially susceptible because one or both parents, a sibling or near relative has had rheumatic fever, respond in a different manner to streptococcal infections than non-rheumatic persons. The response of rheumatic and non-rheumatic subjects to antigenic stimuli has been the objective of several recent investigations (8)(9)(10)(11) none of which has shown any significant differences between rheumatics and non-rheumatics in their response to a variety of non-streptococcal antigens with the exception that when a strain of Brucella abortus was used as the antigen (12,13) rheumatic subjects developed higher levels of agglutinins and incomplete antibodies than normal persons. However, the more crucial question would seem to be: "Do rheumatics respond differently to streptococcal infections or antigens than non-rheumatics ?"…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are exceptions, but, if rheumatics are considered as a group, this observation seems to hold true and it has led to an assumption that rheumatic individuals, that is, those who acquire rheumatic fever or are especially susceptible because one or both parents, a sibling or near relative has had rheumatic fever, respond in a different manner to streptococcal infections than non-rheumatic persons. The response of rheumatic and non-rheumatic subjects to antigenic stimuli has been the objective of several recent investigations (8)(9)(10)(11) none of which has shown any significant differences between rheumatics and non-rheumatics in their response to a variety of non-streptococcal antigens with the exception that when a strain of Brucella abortus was used as the antigen (12,13) rheumatic subjects developed higher levels of agglutinins and incomplete antibodies than normal persons. However, the more crucial question would seem to be: "Do rheumatics respond differently to streptococcal infections or antigens than non-rheumatics ?"…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%