Aggregate formation and soil organic matter under different vegetation in Atlantic Forest from Southeastern Brazil

Abstract

Changes in soil use and management can affect the soil aggregation, including aggregate formation by biogenic and physicogenic processes. The aim of this study was to analyze physical and biological influences on the genesis of soil aggregates in areas with different vegetations in the Atlantic Forest, as well as to compare physical and chemical attributes of the aggregates formed in different ways. Undeformed soil samples were collected from a depth of 0-10 cm from second-growth forests at different successional stages and a pasture area. To identify the pathways of aggregation we used morphological patterns proposed by Bullock et al. (1985), and established three clusters: physicogenic, biogenic, and intermediates. The aggregates were analyzed for stability, exchangeable cations, distribution of total organic carbon (TOC), and oxidizable fractions of total organic carbon. In all areas evaluated, the percentage of physicogenic aggregates was higher than that of biogenic and intermediate aggregates.The biogenic aggregates with the highest mean weight diameter (MWD) and geometric mean diameter (GMD) were recorded for samples from the second-growth forest at an advanced stage of succession (SFAS) and from the mixed managed pasture (MMP) sites (MWD: 4.520 mm and 4.896 mm; GMD: 3.678 mm and 4.479 mm, respectively). The biogenic aggregates presented higher levels of K and P compared to the other morphological types in all areas studied, with higher P levels in the SFAS area. The TOC content was also higher in the biogenic aggregates in all study areas, with 22.33 g kg -1 in SFAS, 25.60 g kg -1 in the site with second-growth forest at the middle stage (SFMS) of succession, 24.74 g kg -1 in the site with second-growth forest at the initial stage (SFIS) of succession, and 20.28 g kg -1 in MMP. The highest content of the fractions F1 (6.93 g kg -1 ) and F2 (7.43 g kg -1 ) were found in the biogenic class compared to the intermediate and physicogenic aggregates. The biological aggregation process was the most efficient process in terms of soil structural stability and carbon sequestration, and biogenic aggregates may be considered indicators of soil quality. Key words: Aggregation. Atlantic Forest. Organic carbon. Oxidizable fractions. ResumoMudanças no uso e manejo do solo podem afetar os processos de agregação, incluindo a formação de agregados por processos biogênicos e fisiogênicos. O objetivo deste estudo foi analisar a gênese de agregados por diferentes vias de formação, bem como atributos físicos e químicos dos agregados formados por essas vias em áreas com diferentes coberturas vegetais. Foram coletadas amostras de

Changes in Physical and Chemical Properties of Calcic Chernozem Affected by Robinia pseudoacacia and Quercus robur Plantings

“…Soil aggregate size distribution is an important characteristic closely related to the soil organic carbon content (Chaplot, Cooper, 2015;Polláková et al, 2018;Six et al, 2004); therefore, it may serve as a specific indicator of the intensity and duration of forest plantations' effect on the soil De Carvalho Silva Neto et al, 2016;.…”

Formation of Macroaggregates and Organic Carbon in Cocoa Agroforestry Systems

“…They regulate ecological functions such as water dynamics in soil, soil porosity, soil organic matter, soil susceptibility to erosion, and nutrient dynamics (Chen et al, 2017). Soil aggregates can be formed as a result of the physical forces in the wetting and drying cycle, the compression by roots and the interaction of the macrofauna with the organ-mineral phase of the soil (Silva et al, 2016). At a functional level, soil aggregates play a vital role in the long-term preservation and storage of organic carbon in the soil (Acar et al, 2018).…”

“…By implementing cocoa under the agroforestry systems, the formation of soil aggregates can be modified (Silva et al, 2016), especially the biogenic aggregates, since a continuous intake of plant residues is guaranteed in quantity and quality, benefitting the macrofauna groups (Moço et al, 2009). These macrofauna groups act mainly on soil structure through bioturbation (Lavelle et al, 2016), creating structures enriched with organic carbon and nutrients (Lubbers et al, 2017).…”

“…The systems varied according to their composition, structure, and time of implementation. According to Silva et al (2016), related studies on the formation of different types of soil aggregates allow not only to understand their dynamics and the associated processes, but also to obtain an integral vision of soil quality. The use of a visual method of aggregate morphology is one way of evaluating soil structure and specifically aggregation (Lavelle et al, 2014), which successfully determines soil structure under different uses and management strategies.…”

Caracterização física de agregados do solo submetido a 10 anos de aplicação de dejetos suínos

“…Os agregados fisiogênicos são aqueles que apresentam formas angulares ou prismáticas e estão relacionados com o processo de aproximação das partículas unitárias do solo relativas aos ciclos de umedecimento e secagem e pela ação de agentes cimentantes do solo (matéria orgânica e, ou, óxidos e hidróxidos de ferro e alumínio), e os agregados biogênicos são aqueles que apresentam formas arredondadas e estão relacionados às vias biológicas de formação, tais como a passagem pelo trato intestinal da macrofauna do solo, especialmente minhocas, e também à ação cimentante de exsudatos das raízes e da biota associada (Velasquez et al, 2007;Batista et al, 2013;Loss et al, 2014). Os agregados biogênicos, em função de serem excretas da macrofauna que se alimenta basicamente de matéria orgânica, apresentam maiores teores de nutrientes, contribuem na proteção física da matéria orgânica (sequestro de carbono), e normalmente possuem maior estabilidade física em água (Silva et al, 2010;Silva et al, 2016), o que pode incluílos como potenciais indicadores de qualidade do solo, uma vez que são sensíveis aos diferentes sistemas de uso e manejo do solo (Loss et al, 2014;Fernandes et al, 2017).…”