Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2460296.2460345
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aggregating social and usage datasets for learning analytics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These data are more varied and usable: work is being done in terms of interoperability of data coming from several learning environments (Walker, 2012;Niemann et al, 2013).…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data are more varied and usable: work is being done in terms of interoperability of data coming from several learning environments (Walker, 2012;Niemann et al, 2013).…”
Section: Background and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a Representational state transfer (REST) web service based on JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) for its data format. xAPI is a specification that produced an application program interface (API), which captures the learning data in the stream and stores them in a repository in the form of "statement" objects using the following structure: <actor> <verb> <object>, with <result>, in <context> xAPI is selected from the reviewed and compared specifications xAPI, Activ-ityStrea.ms [16], IMS 1 Caliper [17], CAM 2 (which is an early approach to capturing and storing attention metadata for single users), NSDL paradata 3 (defined to capture aggregated usage data about a resource which is designated by audience, subject or education level) and Organic.Edunet format [18] (to store social data provision activities and designed in an extendable way, so other user activities) for communication between heterogeneous learning environments in a major contribution that was published [19].…”
Section: Next Generation Of Scorm: Xapi and Cmi5 Specificationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some writers use the terms AfL and FA synonymously (Glasson, 2008;Wiliam, 2007), while others differentiate between the terms FA and AfL (Chappuis & Chappuis, 2008;Stiggins, 2005). We observe that FA has been taken up in university settings as an individualistic process where there is a focus of the learner's metacognitive engagement with classroom material (Niedwiecki, 2013). We are in accord with Klenowski (2009), who reports a second generation definition of AfL, which is embedded in the "everyday practice by students, teachers and peers that seeks, reflects upon and responds to information from dialogue, demonstration and observation in ways that enhance ongoing learning" (Klenowski, 2009;p.2).…”
Section: The Relationship Between Afl and Famentioning
confidence: 68%