1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7519(99)00029-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aggregation and species coexistence of ectoparasites of marine fishes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

13
77
0
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
13
77
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, species are distributed in a way that interspecific interactions are reduced in order to facilitate coexistence (Morand et al 1999, Simková et al 2000. In this study, use of the A coefficient showed that there was a strong reduction of interspecific aggregation in relation to intraspecific aggregation, which might have facilitated the coexistence of cestodes in the spiral intestine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, species are distributed in a way that interspecific interactions are reduced in order to facilitate coexistence (Morand et al 1999, Simková et al 2000. In this study, use of the A coefficient showed that there was a strong reduction of interspecific aggregation in relation to intraspecific aggregation, which might have facilitated the coexistence of cestodes in the spiral intestine.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…At the infracommunity level, the species richness, diversity, dominance, niche breadth, niche overlap, and intraspecific and interspecific aggregation coefficients were considered as follows: Brillouin's diversity index (HB) because each infracommunity was fully censured (Magurran 1988), Berger-Parker dominance index (D), Levin's niche breadth (B), and Renkonen's niche overlap (R) according to Simková et al (2000). In order to compare intraspecific aggregation vs interspecific aggregation, the coefficients of intraspecific (J) and interspecific (C) aggregation, and the reduction in competition caused by intraspecific aggregation in a pair of species (A) according to the coexistence aggregation model, were adapted considering each chamber of the spiral intestine as a different 'patch' (see Morand et al 1999). Whenever it was possible, the infracommunities were classified as "light" and "heavy" infections according to the intensity of infections for the different species of cestodes, where "n" is the number of specimens and "n" the number of infracommunities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leads to the unanticipated conclusion that within-host adaptive diversification of macro-parasites does not depend on the level of aggregation among hosts. Such a conclusion contrasts with the recognized effects of aggregation on population dynamics [38,44] interspecific competition [43,57], and the evolution of both host and parasite [40]. Interestingly, the comparison of speciation rates between clades of monogeneans with low and high levels of aggregation was consistent with this theoretical prediction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…For Rohde (1994), positive interactions are more frequent between fish ectoparasites of the same host than negative interactions. Niche heterogeneity, unpredictable recruitment or the aggregated utilization of fragmented resources favour species coexistence (Morand et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%