2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2014.08.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aggregation of nanoscale iron oxyhydroxides and corresponding effects on metal uptake, retention, and speciation: I. Ionic-strength and pH

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stegemeier et al . 49 , 50 pointed out that the factors that enhance iron oxyhydroxides nanoparticle aggregation generally follow the order of ionic strength ≈ pH < aging < freezing < drying. Accordingly, the interstitial water and pore space between aggregated particles are decreased by these factors and result in greater compaction of the aggregates and smaller specific surface areas in the same order.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stegemeier et al . 49 , 50 pointed out that the factors that enhance iron oxyhydroxides nanoparticle aggregation generally follow the order of ionic strength ≈ pH < aging < freezing < drying. Accordingly, the interstitial water and pore space between aggregated particles are decreased by these factors and result in greater compaction of the aggregates and smaller specific surface areas in the same order.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, the formation of open versus closed structures upon nanoparticle aggregation or agglomeration has important implications for ion sorption by nanoscale oxides and merits further investigation. For example, one study showed that Fe oxide aggregates retained copper more strongly than dispersed nanoparticles, 86 even though the adsorption capacity of aggregates was lower than that of dispersed nanoparticles. 34 …”
Section: Implications For Nanoparticle Reactivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6). Factors that might have contributed to the discrepancy between modeled and measured results are ageing effects such as aggregation and ordering of the ferrihydrite (Dale et al, 2015;Vu et al, 2013), not captured by the oxalate extraction. Another contributing factor could be blocking of reactive sites by humic substances (Gustafsson, 2006), which was not considered in the modeling.…”
Section: Dissolved Concentrations Of Copper and Arsenicmentioning
confidence: 99%