“…This cluster is followed by 3,5,16,17,21,22,32,40,46,52,53,55,and 56. Total: 13 Supporting & Cooperation 3,4,5,8,9,16,17,19,20,21,22,26,27,29,30,31,32,33,35,36,39,41,43,44,45,46,49,50,52,56,59,60,61,and 63. [Collaboration ¼ 20] […”
Section: Big Eleven Skill/competency Dimensions Skills/ Competenciementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information skills/competencies or Information related skills/competencies ¼ 7 (information, systems and technology 7; information, media and technology skills (7); the ability to find, organise and retrieve information (8); information-communication skills (21); information sharing (35); information process (40); information, media and technology skills (41)). large amounts of data; competences for Industry 4.0 (50); data literacy/data literacies; technical, computational and statistical competencies (51); data management; servitisation (53); high-performance computing skills; coding/software engineering/app building skills; software testing skills (55); computer programming, and knowledge of specific software tools) (56) Outliers: fundamental literacy (48); disruptive, radical design-driven, social and responsible innovation (49); data infrastructure literacy (51); design thinking; new skills through continuous learning; user experience design skills (55); investigative and experimental skills (56) Pedestrian: tacit knowledge 44; self-learning solutions; self-direction capabilities (45); responsibility (46); literacy skills (47); people skills (49); career and learning skills (52); Internet literacy skills 55; 21st century skills/competences; self-direction; planning; risk taking; conflict management (59); critical stance (60); basic skills 61; critical writing competence (64) Unclear/Vague: unlimited variability of behaviour; multi-purpose skills; interdisciplinary skills; flexibility to perform adaptive abilities (44); multiand interdisciplinary skills (45); heterogeneous skills (49); transferrable skills; digital skills for the general workforce (56); specific competencies (58); global awareness…”
Much has been said about the fourth industrial revolution (4IR) or Industry 4.0 since its launch in 2011. In addition, certain skills have been touted as specifically 4IR or Industry 4.0 skills. Amidst all this, not much work has been done that focuses on and identifies what those skills are from a cross-disciplinary perspective. The current scoping review study set out to identify skills, competencies and literacies attributed to 4IR/Industry 4.0 by 64 peer-reviewed journal articles drawn from diverse subject disciplines. Three of its findings are worth mentioning. First, skills and competencies attributed to 4IR by the reviewed journal articles are generic soft skills often dubbed the 21st-century skills such as communication, creativity and problem solving. Second, of the hard skills, programming skills feature predominantly as the 4IR skills from the reviewed articles. Thirdly, information literacy is under-represented and under-cited as a skill for 4IR in the reviewed articles.
“…This cluster is followed by 3,5,16,17,21,22,32,40,46,52,53,55,and 56. Total: 13 Supporting & Cooperation 3,4,5,8,9,16,17,19,20,21,22,26,27,29,30,31,32,33,35,36,39,41,43,44,45,46,49,50,52,56,59,60,61,and 63. [Collaboration ¼ 20] […”
Section: Big Eleven Skill/competency Dimensions Skills/ Competenciementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information skills/competencies or Information related skills/competencies ¼ 7 (information, systems and technology 7; information, media and technology skills (7); the ability to find, organise and retrieve information (8); information-communication skills (21); information sharing (35); information process (40); information, media and technology skills (41)). large amounts of data; competences for Industry 4.0 (50); data literacy/data literacies; technical, computational and statistical competencies (51); data management; servitisation (53); high-performance computing skills; coding/software engineering/app building skills; software testing skills (55); computer programming, and knowledge of specific software tools) (56) Outliers: fundamental literacy (48); disruptive, radical design-driven, social and responsible innovation (49); data infrastructure literacy (51); design thinking; new skills through continuous learning; user experience design skills (55); investigative and experimental skills (56) Pedestrian: tacit knowledge 44; self-learning solutions; self-direction capabilities (45); responsibility (46); literacy skills (47); people skills (49); career and learning skills (52); Internet literacy skills 55; 21st century skills/competences; self-direction; planning; risk taking; conflict management (59); critical stance (60); basic skills 61; critical writing competence (64) Unclear/Vague: unlimited variability of behaviour; multi-purpose skills; interdisciplinary skills; flexibility to perform adaptive abilities (44); multiand interdisciplinary skills (45); heterogeneous skills (49); transferrable skills; digital skills for the general workforce (56); specific competencies (58); global awareness…”
Much has been said about the fourth industrial revolution (4IR) or Industry 4.0 since its launch in 2011. In addition, certain skills have been touted as specifically 4IR or Industry 4.0 skills. Amidst all this, not much work has been done that focuses on and identifies what those skills are from a cross-disciplinary perspective. The current scoping review study set out to identify skills, competencies and literacies attributed to 4IR/Industry 4.0 by 64 peer-reviewed journal articles drawn from diverse subject disciplines. Three of its findings are worth mentioning. First, skills and competencies attributed to 4IR by the reviewed journal articles are generic soft skills often dubbed the 21st-century skills such as communication, creativity and problem solving. Second, of the hard skills, programming skills feature predominantly as the 4IR skills from the reviewed articles. Thirdly, information literacy is under-represented and under-cited as a skill for 4IR in the reviewed articles.
“…Lai rastu ieskatu jaunākajos empīriskajos pētījumos par darba vidē balstītām studijām augstākajā profesionālajā izglītībā Eiropā, tika izmantotas Vācijas (2 publikācijas), Nīderlandes, Spānijas un Rumānijas pētnieku zinātniskās publikācijas (Esteban & Arahal, 2015;Guo, Saab, Post, & Admiraal, 2020;Longmuß & Benjamin, 2017;Müller, Reise, Duc, & Seliger, 2016;Neacsu, 2015) par šo tēmu, kas pēdējo piecu gadu laikā publicētas inženierzinātņu un veselības aprūpes jomā.…”
Section: Ieskats Darba Vidē Balstītu Studiju Pētījumu Metodoloģijā Research Methodology For Inquiry On Work-based Studiesunclassified
“…Pētījums, kura pamatā ir produkta ražošanas process studiju laikā, ļauj noskaidrot izmaiņas darba procesa izpratnē (Guo et al, 2020). Divos pētījumos skatīts arī studentus reālajā darba tirgū iesaistījušo darba devēju viedoklis par darba spēka kvalitāti un efektivitāti, ja praktisko iemaņu apguve studiju laikā notiek uzņēmumā jeb potenciālajā studenta darba vietā (Esteban & Arahal, 2015;Longmuß & Benjamin, 2017). Pētījums, kas vērsts uz lidmašīnu projektēšanu studiju laikā, sniedz ieskatu efektīvās praktisko studiju metodēs lielām studentu grupām (Esteban & Arahal, 2015).…”
Section: Ieskats Darba Vidē Balstītu Studiju Pētījumu Metodoloģijā Research Methodology For Inquiry On Work-based Studiesunclassified
“…Pētījums, kas vērsts uz lidmašīnu projektēšanu studiju laikā, sniedz ieskatu efektīvās praktisko studiju metodēs lielām studentu grupām (Esteban & Arahal, 2015). Savukārt pētījums, kura pamatā ir konkrētas problēmas risinājuma īstenošana, piedāvā jauna modeļa izveidi un ieviešanu uzņēmuma darbībā, kas paredzēta tieši potenciālajiem darbiniekiem (Longmuß & Benjamin, 2017). Visus pētījumus vienojošais elements ir uz gala produktu vai pakalpojumu virzīts studiju process.…”
Section: Ieskats Darba Vidē Balstītu Studiju Pētījumu Metodoloģijā Research Methodology For Inquiry On Work-based Studiesunclassified
Work-based learning has been developing rapidly in Latvia for the last three years. Since 2017, the Employers’ Confederation of Latvia has been implementing a project of the European Social Fund, which provides for a tripartite learning implementation agreement between the educational institution, the student, and the employer. The project targets vocational learners, but equivalent opportunities are also spoken of in higher vocational education. Such an approach would help the employer direct the future employees in the direction of acquiring the necessary knowledge and skills. The publication aims to give a short overview of the historical development of learning opportunities in the working environment in Latvia, the concepts used in research, as well as to look at the research methodology used in the studies of work-based environment in higher professional education in Latvia and Europe and the results of those studies. The first section of the article discusses historical problems of work-based learning, analyses the normative acts and relevant concepts to support further research. The second section analyses methodological approaches to the studies related to the organization of work-based learning. The results of this theoretical and methodological review will serve as a theoretical basis for empirical research related to the introduction of work-based studies in higher professional education in Latvia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.