2014
DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aging Affects the Interaction between Attentional Control and Source Memory: An fMRI Study

Abstract: Age-related source memory impairments may be due, at least in part, to deficits in executive processes mediated by the PFC at both study and test. Behavioral work suggests that providing environmental support at encoding, such as directing attention toward item-source associations, may improve source memory and reduce age-related deficits in the recruitment of these executive processes. The present fMRI study investigated the effects of directed attention and aging on source memory encoding and retrieval. At s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

12
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
12
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The loci of these ‘monitoring effects’ overlapped the effects reported in prior studies, despite the employment of a very different memory test (associative recognition rather than Remember/Know) and, consequently, a quite different operationalization of retrieval monitoring. As was also reported in three previous studies where PFC monitoring effects were contrasted according to age group (Giovanello et al, 2010; Dulas & Duarte, 2014; Wang et al, 2016; see also Mark & Rugg, 1998, and Dulas & Duarte, 2013, for convergent ERP evidence), the present effects were age-invariant. These findings are seemingly inconsistent with the results of two other studies where fMRI monitoring effects were contrasted according to age (McDonough et al, 2013; Mitchell et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The loci of these ‘monitoring effects’ overlapped the effects reported in prior studies, despite the employment of a very different memory test (associative recognition rather than Remember/Know) and, consequently, a quite different operationalization of retrieval monitoring. As was also reported in three previous studies where PFC monitoring effects were contrasted according to age group (Giovanello et al, 2010; Dulas & Duarte, 2014; Wang et al, 2016; see also Mark & Rugg, 1998, and Dulas & Duarte, 2013, for convergent ERP evidence), the present effects were age-invariant. These findings are seemingly inconsistent with the results of two other studies where fMRI monitoring effects were contrasted according to age (McDonough et al, 2013; Mitchell et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A relatively small number of fMRI studies have investigated the effects of age on the neural correlates of monitoring and, echoing findings from studies of recollection success, have yielded inconsistent results (see, for example, Duarte et al, 2010; Giovanello et al, 2010; Dulas & Duarte, 2014; Wang et al, 2016, for reports of null effects of age, and McDonough et al, 2013, and Mitchell et al, 2013, for reports of age-related impairment in monitoring-related activity in rDLPFC). Here, we examined whether fMRI ‘monitoring effects’ are sensitive not only to age, but also to individual differences in memory performance (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We tentatively suggest that this prefrontal-hippocampal communication may be age-invariant during context retrieval. This would be consistent with previous neuroimaging findings showing age invariance for medial temporal lobe contributions during episodic retrieval (Dulas & Duarte, 2014; Duverne et al, 2009; Morcom et al, 2007). Nonetheless, the diagnostic quality of the episodic information, with respect to the contextual decision, reflected in this communication likely differs between young and older adults.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Emerging evidence suggests that explicitly instructing both younger and older adults to attend to the relationship between an item and its context increases memory for the item-context association in both groups (Dulas & Duarte, 2013, 2014; Glisky & Kong, 2008; Glisky, Rubin, & Davidson, 2001; Hashtroudi, Johnson, Vnek, & Ferguson, 1994; Kuo & Van Petten, 2006; Naveh-Benjamin, Brav, & Levy, 2007). For example, directing attention to an item-color association (e.g., “Is this a likely color for this item?”) increases memory for that association over directing attention to the item alone (e.g., “Is this item smaller than a shoebox?”) (Dulas & Duarte, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the source memory deficits outlined by Moscovitch & Winocur (1992) may arise in part from a failure to spontaneously engage associative strategies at encoding. In a recent study that tests this idea, Dulas and Duarte (2014) examined the effect of directing attention to object-feature associations on source memory encoding and retrieval processes. They found that for both age groups, directed attention was associated with increased activity in medial temporal (i.e.…”
Section: Neuropsychological Aging and Imaging Brain Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%