2008
DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.23.1.181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aging and perception of visual form from temporal structure.

Abstract: In this study, the authors examined age-related changes in participants' ability to perceive global spatial structure defined by temporal fine structure among elements undergoing rapid, irregular change. Participants were also tested on a task involving form recognition from luminance contrast and on a task dependent on perception of 3-dimensional shape from motion. Compared with young adults, older individuals were less sensitive to spatial form defined by temporal structure. In contrast, older observers perf… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, older adults have exhibited deficits in using motion to extract self-motion information (Warren, Blackwell & Morris, 1989), to perceive shape (Blake, Rizzo & McEvoy, 2008; Norman, Bartholomew & Burton, 2008; Norman, Clayton, Shular & Thompson, 2004; Norman, Dawson & Butler, 2000; Wist, Schrauf & Ehrenstein, 2000), and to identify collision paths (Andersen, Cisneros, Saidpour & Atchley, 2000; Anderson & Enriquez, 2006). Under certain stimulus conditions older adults also show deficits in the perception of biological motion (Billino, Bremmer & Gegenfurtner, 2008; Norman, Payton, Long & Hawkes, 2004), which may stem from difficulties in efficiently integrating local motion cues with global motion information (Pilz, Bennett & Sekuler, 2010).…”
Section: Processing Of Time-varying Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, older adults have exhibited deficits in using motion to extract self-motion information (Warren, Blackwell & Morris, 1989), to perceive shape (Blake, Rizzo & McEvoy, 2008; Norman, Bartholomew & Burton, 2008; Norman, Clayton, Shular & Thompson, 2004; Norman, Dawson & Butler, 2000; Wist, Schrauf & Ehrenstein, 2000), and to identify collision paths (Andersen, Cisneros, Saidpour & Atchley, 2000; Anderson & Enriquez, 2006). Under certain stimulus conditions older adults also show deficits in the perception of biological motion (Billino, Bremmer & Gegenfurtner, 2008; Norman, Payton, Long & Hawkes, 2004), which may stem from difficulties in efficiently integrating local motion cues with global motion information (Pilz, Bennett & Sekuler, 2010).…”
Section: Processing Of Time-varying Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showing that figure-ground perception entails inhibition together with the evidence for a decline in the efficiency of inhibitory processes with age leads to the prediction that figure-ground perception should be impaired in older compared to younger adults. Indeed, Blake, Rizzo, and McEvoy (2008) showed that figure-ground perception based on temporal structure differences between two regions in a display was impaired in older compared to younger adults when the task was difficult (i.e., when the temporal structure difference between the two regions was small). Blake et al hypothesized that their results could be explained by reductions in the strength of the inhibitory component of a biphasic (excitatory and inhibitory) temporal filter necessary to perceive figureground from temporal structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, whilst for young adults, activation in sensory regions for attended items increases and to ignored items decreases (compared to a neutral baseline), older adults show only the increases in activation for attended items (Gazzaley et al, 2005a,b). Finally, older adults have worse temporal resolution than younger adults (Andersen and Ni, 2008;Blake et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%