2009
DOI: 10.3758/app.71.1.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aging and the perception of slant from optical texture, motion parallax, and binocular disparity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

7
33
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
7
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several possible reasons why no age differences were found in either of these studies (Norman et al, 2004; Norman et al, 2009). One possibility, of course, is that there are simply no effects of age on depth perception from motion parallax.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There are several possible reasons why no age differences were found in either of these studies (Norman et al, 2004; Norman et al, 2009). One possibility, of course, is that there are simply no effects of age on depth perception from motion parallax.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
“…One last possibility is that the effects of age on MP may only be apparent under some stimulus conditions. For example, in Norman et al’s (2009) study, the velocity at which the MP stimulus translated (generating pursuit eye movements, or dα), was 12 deg/sec. In their 2004 study, observers’ head movements were not strictly controlled, so the speed at which observers moved their heads (and generated the concomitant pursuit signal in the direction opposite that of head movement; Nawrot & Joyce, 2006) is unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Kaneko and Howard (1997) used palm board matches to full-cue surfaces to try to calibrate these measures for their main experiment but did not report the obtained functions. However, palm board data from Norman et al (2009), for example, showed the same sort of measurement bias (toward horizontal) as that investigated by Durgin et al (2010). Durgin et al (2010) did find that gesturing freely with an unseen hand produced a gain of essentially 1 for near full-cue surfaces but that similar gestures overestimated the slants of hills (see also Bridgeman & Hoover, 2008).…”
Section: Experiments 1 Numeric Estimates Of the Slants Of Visual Surfamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In Gibson's (1950) early framework, a frontal surface was defined as having zero optical slant, so that the frontal tendency was described as the underestimation t of slant (see also Norman et al, 2009). Here, we follow, instead, Sedgwick's (1986) practice of defining optical slant so that a frontal surface is stipulated as having an optical , LI, , AN AND HAJNA AJNAL calibration of the hopped-on leg (Durgin, Fox, & Kim, 2003).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%