2017
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-017-1392-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aging and visual 3-D shape recognition from motion

Abstract: Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the ability of younger and older adults to recognize 3-D object shape from patterns of optical motion. In Experiment 1, participants were required to identify dotted surfaces that rotated in depth (i.e., surface structure portrayed using the kinetic depth effect). The task difficulty was manipulated by limiting the surface point lifetimes within the stimulus apparent motion sequences. In Experiment 2, the participants identified solid, naturally shaped objects (replic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From such 5 × 5 confusion matrices, d' values (the signal-detection measure of perceptual 5). This calculation of pairwise object discriminability (for 10 pairs of objects) from 5 × 5 confusion matrices was analogous to the procedures used in past research (e.g., Bell & Lappin, 1973;Norman et al, 2017;Norman et al, 2000). Figure 4 plots the observers' shape discrimination performances for the 10 different pairs of objects in terms of d' for both moving and stationary objects/cast shadows.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…From such 5 × 5 confusion matrices, d' values (the signal-detection measure of perceptual 5). This calculation of pairwise object discriminability (for 10 pairs of objects) from 5 × 5 confusion matrices was analogous to the procedures used in past research (e.g., Bell & Lappin, 1973;Norman et al, 2017;Norman et al, 2000). Figure 4 plots the observers' shape discrimination performances for the 10 different pairs of objects in terms of d' for both moving and stationary objects/cast shadows.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Some functions, such as the ability to judge environmental distance, are well preserved with age, while other abilities deteriorate. A good example of this would be motion perception: Aging adversely affects the performance of many motion-related tasks (e.g., Andersen & Atchley, 1995; Ball & Sekuler, 1986; Billino et al., 2008; Billino & Pilz, 2019; Norman et al., 2017; Norman et al., 2003; Norman et al., 2020; Pilz et al., 2010; Shain & Norman, 2018). Given that aging has been shown to negatively affect the functionality of motion-sensitive cortical areas in the dorsal visual stream (e.g., cortical area MT, see Liang et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2009), it is not surprising that older adults exhibit behavioral deficits for tasks requiring the detection of coherent motion, perceived shape from motion, speed discrimination, and so on.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While aging has widespread effects upon motion perception and also adversely affects the detection and recognition of three-dimensional shape from motion (e.g., Andersen & Atchley, 1995; Norman, Adkins, Dowell, Hoyng, et al., 2017; Norman et al., 2012, 2013;), it is interesting that aging does not necessarily negatively impact solid shape discrimination (Norman et al., 2006) or distance perception (Norman, Adkins, Dowell, Shain, et al., 2017; Norman, Adkins, Norman, Cox, & Rogers, 2015; Norman, Adkins, & Pedersen, 2016). Our present and past results therefore support the general conclusion of Billino et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%