2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00182-011-0296-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AGM-consistency and perfect Bayesian equilibrium. Part I: definition and properties

Abstract: We provide a general notion of perfect Bayesian equilibrium which can be applied to arbitrary extensive-form games and is intermediate between subgame-perfect equilibrium and sequential equilibrium. The essential ingredient of the proposed definition is the qualitative notion of AGM-consistency, which has an epistemic justification based on the theory of belief revision introduced by Alchourrón, Gärdenfors and Makinson. AGM-consistency is a generalization of the notion of consistency introduced by Kreps and Wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section we recall the notion of perfect Bayesian equilibrium introduced in [6]; we employ the same notation, which makes use of the history-based de…nition of extensive-form game (see [11]). As in [6], we restrict attention to …nite extensive-form games with perfect recall.…”
Section: Agm-consistency and Perfect Bayesian Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In this section we recall the notion of perfect Bayesian equilibrium introduced in [6]; we employ the same notation, which makes use of the history-based de…nition of extensive-form game (see [11]). As in [6], we restrict attention to …nite extensive-form games with perfect recall.…”
Section: Agm-consistency and Perfect Bayesian Equilibriummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Property B3 requires the system of beliefs to satisfy Bayes'rule in the sense that if h 2 E and (h) > 0 (so that E is the equivalence class of the most plausible elements of I(h)) then for every history h 0 2 I(h), (h 0 ) (the probability assigned to h 0 by ) coincides with the probability of h 0 conditional on I(h) using the probability measure E . How should one interpret the probability E (h) of De…nition 3?…”
Section: De…nitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations