1997
DOI: 10.1080/02687039708248485
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agrammatic and non-brain-damaged subjects' verb and verb argument structure production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

21
130
1
10

Year Published

2000
2000
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 240 publications
(162 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
21
130
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…However, deficits were observed in verb naming and verb categorization, which required that participants sort verbs by their argument structure properties. 1 In both verb tasks, a hierarchy like that reported by Thompson et al (1995aThompson et al ( , 1997 was found, with verbs requiring more arguments more difficult than verbs requiring fewer. These findings suggested that verb production is influenced by the syntactically relevant argument-taking properties of verbs (Levin & Rappaport-Hovav, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, deficits were observed in verb naming and verb categorization, which required that participants sort verbs by their argument structure properties. 1 In both verb tasks, a hierarchy like that reported by Thompson et al (1995aThompson et al ( , 1997 was found, with verbs requiring more arguments more difficult than verbs requiring fewer. These findings suggested that verb production is influenced by the syntactically relevant argument-taking properties of verbs (Levin & Rappaport-Hovav, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Results of administration of the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB; Kertesz, 1982), the Northwestern Sentence Comprehension Test (NSCT; Thompson, unpublished), a sentence production priming task, the Northwestern Verb Production Battery (Thompson et al, 1997), and narrative discourse analysis led to a diagnosis of agrammatic aphasia for all subjects. (See Table 1 for results of testing.)…”
Section: Language Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations