2012
DOI: 10.3733/ca.v066n03p85
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agricultural burning monitored for air pollutants in Imperial County; exposure reduction recommendations developed

Abstract: Air pollutants, notably particulate matter (PM) with aerodynamic diameter smaller than 2.5 micrometers (PM 2.5 ), are emitted during agricultural burning. We studied a winter period in Imperial County when predominantly bermudagrass stubble was burned. At four locations, PM 2.5 levels were 23% higher from 4 p.m. on burn days to 8 a.m. the following morning than on days when there were no burns. On days when a burn was within 2 miles of a monitoring site, concentrations were 7 to 8 micrograms per cubic meter hi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Agricultural Burning was strongly observed at SB and WI, accounting for 4% and 5% of the observed mass at each site, respectively (Figures D and S10). This is likely due to the proximity of these sites to active agricultural regions where burning is known to occur in both summer and winter …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agricultural Burning was strongly observed at SB and WI, accounting for 4% and 5% of the observed mass at each site, respectively (Figures D and S10). This is likely due to the proximity of these sites to active agricultural regions where burning is known to occur in both summer and winter …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future study designs that allow for longer passive sampling times (>1 week) would increase the value of the passive sampling approach. In cases where return sampler retrieval visits are not possible on this timescale, the samples can be retrieved by participants and mailed to the lab [34].…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rural communities can be exposed to airborne particulate matter with aerodynamic diameters less than 2.5 µm (PM 2.5 ) from a range of compositions and sources, including windblown dust, biological and plant aerosols, crop burning, and diesel exhaust from construction and vehicles (Record and Baci, 1980;Watson and Chow, 2001;Harnly et al, 2012). When measurements of community exposures to PM 2.5 are determined to be high compared to health standards, identification of the most prominent PM 2.5 sources enables more effective control and assessment of potential health impacts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%