2013
DOI: 10.1017/s175173111300089x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agriculture in the climate change negotiations; ensuring that food production is not threatened

Abstract: With the human population predicted to reach nine billion by 2050, demand for food is predicted to more than double over this time period, a trend which will lead to increased greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from agriculture. Furthermore, expansion in food production is predicted to occur primarily in the developing world, where adaptation to climate change may be more difficult and opportunities to mitigate emissions limited. In the establishment of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UN… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The broad interpretation of CSA creates a common ground to depart from, but some actors raise the question what is – and what is not – CSA. Although the entrepreneurs have initiated CSA as an alternative approach to those initiated by existing institutions, developments regarding agriculture in the UNFCCC negotiations seem to impact the broader interest in CSA in the second episode: support for collaboration around CSA declines with Parties requesting a formal Program of Work around agriculture at the 17th UNFCCC Conference of the Parties (COP17), and rises again when at the 18th UN Conference of the Parties (COP18) their request is rejected (Muldowney et al., ). In the words of a researcher: ‘CSA was important to us because we were looking for an alternative platform to get agriculture into the UNFCCC’ (interview 8).…”
Section: Results: Three Entrepreneurs Three Episodes Towards Establimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The broad interpretation of CSA creates a common ground to depart from, but some actors raise the question what is – and what is not – CSA. Although the entrepreneurs have initiated CSA as an alternative approach to those initiated by existing institutions, developments regarding agriculture in the UNFCCC negotiations seem to impact the broader interest in CSA in the second episode: support for collaboration around CSA declines with Parties requesting a formal Program of Work around agriculture at the 17th UNFCCC Conference of the Parties (COP17), and rises again when at the 18th UN Conference of the Parties (COP18) their request is rejected (Muldowney et al., ). In the words of a researcher: ‘CSA was important to us because we were looking for an alternative platform to get agriculture into the UNFCCC’ (interview 8).…”
Section: Results: Three Entrepreneurs Three Episodes Towards Establimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main driving forces for the development of biomass in the United States are: (1) to reduce dependence on oil imports and guarantee oil security; (2) to create more employment opportunities and develop agriculture; (3) to promote the development of low-carbon and sustainable economy; and (4) to explore new industries and new technologies so as to form a situation of diversified energy sources and production supply.…”
Section: The United Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Climate change is a vital challenge now, and by the estimate of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the global temperature will rise by 1.4-5.8 1C. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) set the goal of keeping global temperature rises to be below 2 1C in 2012 [2], which needs to decrease the greenhouse gas (GHG) emission. Bioenergy is a low-carbon and sustainable energy, and is well adaptable for existing fuel storage systems and transportation equipment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At first sight, these objectives are contradictory, but 'dilution of maintenance' effects mean that more productive animals are usually more efficient, with reduced emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) per unit product. Balancing the costs and benefits of a wide range of options from disparate activities is an important part of the inter-governmental negotiations on climate change and Muldowney et al (2013) from the Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine in Ireland provided some context for the position of agriculture in these negotiations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was with great vision that Professor Takahashi and colleagues organised the first Greenhouse Gases and Animal Agriculture (GGAA) conference in Japan in 2001. Subsequent meetings were held in In addition to setting the scene for inter-governmental negotiations on climate change (Muldowney et al, 2013), the opening session also surveyed the range of mitigation options with a focus on opportunities and constraints for implementation and exploitation in GHG inventories (Gerber et al, 2013). Life cycle analysis is increasingly used to quantify the total emissions associated with production systems, allowing the user to account for trade-offs between effects and incorporate the indirect emissions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%