2010
DOI: 10.1134/s207511171003001x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agrilus planipennis Fairmaire in Moscow ash trees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The aim was to determine whether there were trees infested with A. planipennis in this forest. Baranchikov et al 2008;Izhevskii and Mozolevskaya 2010;Straw et al 2013 Moscow reg.…”
Section: Localities Of the Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim was to determine whether there were trees infested with A. planipennis in this forest. Baranchikov et al 2008;Izhevskii and Mozolevskaya 2010;Straw et al 2013 Moscow reg.…”
Section: Localities Of the Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This outbreak was recorded after 2002, i.e. before the first specimen of A. planipennis was found (Izhevskii, 2007). It is possible that H. varius thrived because A. planipennis weakened the ash trees, but it is also possible that the establishment of A. planipennis was facilitated by an outbreak of H. varius.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other outbreaks of A. glabripennis have also shown a delay of 5–10 years between establishment and the time when the infestation was first reported (Hérard et al ., ; Sawyer et al ., , ; Dodds & Orwig, ; Favaro et al ., ; Loomans et al ., ; Turgeon et al ., ) and this appears to be a common feature of outbreaks of wood‐boring pests. The cryptic nature of the wood‐boring life style means that infestations usually remain undetected for several years and it is not until a substantial amount of damage has accumulated, and dieback and tree mortality have become noticeable, that the outbreak attracts attention and action is taken (Fielding et al ., ; Izhevskii & Mozolevskaya, ; Siegert et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%