Agro‐biotechnology and organic food purchase in the United Kingdom

Abstract

PurposeThe objective of this paper is to evaluate the role of consumers’ perceived risks and benefits of agro‐biotechnology in shaping the purchase pattern for organic food among UK consumers.Design/methodology/approachAn on‐line household survey of UK consumers was conducted using household panels maintained by the National Panel Diary (NPD) group. The data included organic food purchase pattern, perceived risks and benefits of agro‐biotechnology, and socio‐demographic information about the respondents. A regression model was used to examine the impact of consumers’ general purchase behavior, perceived risks and benefits of GM technology, and socio‐demographic on organic food purchase.FindingsOnly 4 percent of the respondents purchased organic foods all the time, while 26 percent never purchased. Perceived risks of agro‐biotechnology played a dominant role in influencing organic food purchase decisions. As the risk perception increased consumers were likely to buy organic food more often. Although premium prices of organic foods were of concern to many consumers, food safety was the most important consideration when making organic food purchase decisions. Household income positively influenced consumers’ likelihood of buying organic food. Female respondents were likely to purchase organic foods more often than their male counter parts. Older respondents were less likely to buy organic foods compared to younger respondents.Practical implicationsThe results of this study provide valuable information in formulating short and long‐term marketing programs for organic producers. Following the study results, food safety concern and perceived risks of GM food products need to be the overall theme of marketing programs for organic products.Originality/valueThe study uses a large sample size in examining the relationship between perceived risks of agro‐biotechnology and organic food purchase. The results are more robust and representative.

Organic food and the plural moralities of food provisioning

“…Several studies find that organic food is perceived as safer than conventionally produced food (e.g. Michaelidou and Hassan, 2008;Rimal et al, 2005;Hammitt, 2000, 2001), indicating that organic food consumption may be seen as a response to food scares (e.g. Chen, 2009;O'Donovan and McCarthy, 2002) or to risk society in general (e.g.…”

Coffee shop consumers’ emotional attachment and loyalty to green stores: The moderating role of green consciousness

“…They used a consumer panel of US coffee consumers to conduct a permission-based survey maintained by Qualtrics, the world's leading panel survey software firm (www.qualtrics.com). Panel surveys have seen increasingly greater academic and commercial use as a valuable tool to investigate a wide range of consumer behaviors (Evans and Mathur, 2005;Goodman et al, 2012;Rimal et al, 2005). With a proven record of validated consumer panel groups, Qualtrics assists researchers in gathering more reliable data highlighted by high response rates and at relatively low cost (Zikmund and Babin, 1999).…”

Farmer share and fair distribution in food chains from a consumer’s perspective

“…This is supported by findings that indicate that consumers' fairness preferences can be observed in other instances, aside from just fair trade labeled products. There are hints that people are interested in food that is fairer in terms of revenue shifting to (family) farms and fair prices for farmers (Rimal et al, 2006, Chang & Lusk, 2009, Zander & Hamm, 2010and Briggeman & Lusk, 2011Toler et al, 2009 andSchneider &Francis, 2005 for local food). This is in line with the "underdog hypothesis", describing biased support for small, disadvantaged but passionate brands or companies (Paharia et al, 2011).…”