2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00299-005-0022-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agrobacterium and biolistic transformation of onion using non-antibiotic selection marker phosphomannose isomerase

Abstract: A new selection system for onion transformation that does not require the use of antibiotics or herbicides was developed. The selection system used the Escherichia coli gene that encodes phosphomannose isomerase (pmi). Transgenic plants carrying the manA gene that codes for pmi can detoxify mannose-6-phosphate by conversion to fructose-6-phosphate, an intermediate of glycolysis, via the pmi activity. Six-week-old embryogenic callus initiated from seedling radicle was used for transformation. Transgenic plants … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is a very high efficiency of transformation, when compared with reported data for other plant species. For example, TE reached 25 % in wheat , 30 % for maize (Negrotto et al 2000), 31 % for hemp (Feeney and Punja 2003), 41 % for rice (Lucca et al 2001), 23 % for cucumber (He et al 2006), 23 or 27 % for onion (Aswath et al 2006), 6.8 % for almond (Ramesh et al 2006) but only 0.72 % for pearl millet (O'Kennedy et al 2004), 0.94 % for sugar beet (Joersbo et al 1998), 1.14 % for durum wheat (Gadaleta et al 2006) or 3 -24 % for sweet orange (Boscariol et al 2003). When compared with kanamycin selection (TE = 33.3 %, Table 4) the transformation efficiency of optimal mannose selection procedure was about 1.5-fold higher.…”
Section: Tomato Transformationmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is a very high efficiency of transformation, when compared with reported data for other plant species. For example, TE reached 25 % in wheat , 30 % for maize (Negrotto et al 2000), 31 % for hemp (Feeney and Punja 2003), 41 % for rice (Lucca et al 2001), 23 % for cucumber (He et al 2006), 23 or 27 % for onion (Aswath et al 2006), 6.8 % for almond (Ramesh et al 2006) but only 0.72 % for pearl millet (O'Kennedy et al 2004), 0.94 % for sugar beet (Joersbo et al 1998), 1.14 % for durum wheat (Gadaleta et al 2006) or 3 -24 % for sweet orange (Boscariol et al 2003). When compared with kanamycin selection (TE = 33.3 %, Table 4) the transformation efficiency of optimal mannose selection procedure was about 1.5-fold higher.…”
Section: Tomato Transformationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The phosphomannose isomerase (pmi) gene was originally used as a selectable marker by Joersbo et al (1998) for the transformation of sugar beet. In the following years, PMI was shown to be an useful marker in the Agrobacterium transformation of a number of plant species such as cassava (Zhang et al 2000), maize (Negrotto et al 2000, Arabidopsis (Todd and Tague 2001), wheat , Gadaleta et al 2006, rice (Lucca et al 2001), sweet orange (Boscariol et al 2003), hemp (Feeney and Punja 2003), pearl millet (O'Kennedy et al 2004), bentgrass (Fu et al 2005), papaya (Zhu et al 2005), sorghum (Gao et al 2005), almond (Ramesh et al 2006), onion (Aswath et al 2006), cucumber (He et al 2006) and Chinese cabbage (Ku et al 2006). In tomato, Sigareva et al (2004) employed the mannose selection procedure for the transformation of cotyledon petiole, hypocotyls and leaf explants of three cultivars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The mannose positive selection system favors the regeneration and growth of transgenic cells expressing the 6-phosphomannose isomerase (PMI) gene, manA, while the growth of non-transgenic cells is inhibited through carbohydrate starvation (positive selection). The utility of the pmi gene from Escherichia coli (Miles and Guest 1984) as a positive selectable marker in conjunction with mannose for recovery of transgenic plants (pmi/Man) has been demonstrated in a number of crops, including sugar beet (Joersbo et al 1998), cassava , maize (Wang et al 2000;Wright et al 2001), wheat , pepper (Kim et al 2002), sweet orange (Boscariol et al 2003), pearl millet (O'Kennedy et al 2004), tomato (Sigareva et al 2004), papaya (Zhu et al 2005), onion (Aswath et al 2006), almond (Ramesh et al 2006), cucumber (He et al 2006), maize (Privalle 2002), rice (He et al 2004), barley , apple (Degenhardt et al 2006), cabbage (Min et al 2007), sugarcane (Jain et al 2007), flax (Lamblin et al 2007), citrus (Ballester et al 2008), sorghum (Gurel et al 2009) and chickpea (Patil et al 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The pmi/Man system has been successfully used in several plant systems such as sugar beet (Joersbo et al 1998), cassava (Zhang and Puonti-Kaerlas 2000), maize (Negrotto et al 2000;Wright et al 2001), Arabidopsis (Todd and Tague 2001), wheat , tobacco and potato (Kunze et al 2001), pepper (Kim et al 2002), sweet orange (Boscariol et al 2003), pearl millet (O'Kennedy et al 2004), tomato (Sigareva et al 2004, papaya (Zhu et al 2005), bentgrass (Fu et al 2005), apple (Degenhardt et al 2006), onion (Aswath et al 2006), almond (Ramesh et al 2006), cucumber (He et al 2006), cabbage (Min et al 2007), sugarcane (Jain et al 2007), flax (Lamblin et al 2007), citrus (Ballester et al 2008), sorghum (Gurel et al 2009) and chickpea (Patil et al 2009). However, the pmi/Man system has not been tested previously in Oncidium orchid.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%