2020
DOI: 10.1007/s12892-020-00078-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Agronomic management options to enhance adoption of maize–common bean–common bean sequential intercropping in southern Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In sole cropping conditions, the higher intraspecific competition decreased the nutrient use efficiency of nutrients. Therefore, it can be concluded that the higher nutrient accessibility by BFS application along with improvement of environmental use efficiency and better spatial, temporal and chemical complementarity of both plants in intercropping patterns enhanced the LER index when compared with sole cropping conditions 33 . Moreover, atmospheric nitrogen fixation by the legume component of the system (fenugreek) and its direct/indirect transfer to the non-legume component (fennel) reduced the competition for inorganic nitrogen at the whole system level and enhanced plant productivity by improving nutrient absorption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In sole cropping conditions, the higher intraspecific competition decreased the nutrient use efficiency of nutrients. Therefore, it can be concluded that the higher nutrient accessibility by BFS application along with improvement of environmental use efficiency and better spatial, temporal and chemical complementarity of both plants in intercropping patterns enhanced the LER index when compared with sole cropping conditions 33 . Moreover, atmospheric nitrogen fixation by the legume component of the system (fenugreek) and its direct/indirect transfer to the non-legume component (fennel) reduced the competition for inorganic nitrogen at the whole system level and enhanced plant productivity by improving nutrient absorption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…For instance, intercropping is more productive and economical when both crops differ in genetic makeup, photosynthetic pathways, growth habit, growth duration, and demand for different growth resources [12,13]. Therefore, intercropping can only provide a yield advantage over sole cropping if the component crops use natural resources in complementary ways [14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%